IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p5194-5235.html

More Than 10 Years on: Does a State‐of‐the‐Art Review and Synthesis Offer New Frameworks to Guide Future Design for Remanufacturing Research?

Author

Listed:
  • Okechukwu Okorie
  • Yogendra Singh
  • Jennifer Russell
  • Chris Turner
  • Kingsley Oturu

Abstract

There is strong evidence that design for remanufacturing (DfRem) can reduce initial‐design carbon emissions by up to 30%, and that product design can critically affect remanufacturing feasibility, yet academic adoption of DfRem remains limited. The last major review of DfRem dates to 2011, despite substantial evolution across environmental, economic, technological, and methodological domains. Through a review of 174 publications, this study maps the current DfRem research landscape and proposes a systematic framework approach to guide future research directions. Review findings reveal a transition from DfRem research addressed within conventional design challenges and tool development priorities, to data‐driven, sustainability‐motivated methodologies and studies. Clear emphases on OEM perspectives and the automotive sector are also identified. Notably, recent exploration and integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into DfRem research, that is, via digital twins, smart remanufacturing, and cyber‐physical systems, marks a significant and evolving shift that is logical in the context of OEM case studies. Methodologies used to study these innovations are founded upon, and increasingly aligned with eco‐design, life‐cycle assessment, and human‐centric frameworks. Methodologically, DfRem research is evolving from conceptual and secondary‐data studies toward empirical, validated research predominantly conducted as case studies, while a strong emphasis on technical engineering perspectives persists. Two resulting frameworks are presented to capture diverse perspectives related to emergent research priorities for DfRem on the basis of process versus product research focus, and analysis versus design research focus. Through the course of this review, we demonstrate DfRem as an increasingly relevant and critical enabler for the advancement of operationalized circular economy, lifecycle extension, and net‐zero strategies within sustainable manufacturing systems, and present our recommendations for continued progress, accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Okechukwu Okorie & Yogendra Singh & Jennifer Russell & Chris Turner & Kingsley Oturu, 2026. "More Than 10 Years on: Does a State‐of‐the‐Art Review and Synthesis Offer New Frameworks to Guide Future Design for Remanufacturing Research?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5194-5235, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5194-5235
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70416
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5194-5235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.