IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p4985-4999.html

Merging Psychological, Social, and Rational Perspectives: A Study of the Determinants of Consumer Choices for Sustainable Furniture

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Maria Dangelico
  • Luca Fraccascia
  • Valerio Schiaroli

Abstract

This study examines consumer purchase intentions for a sofa produced through industrial symbiosis (IS), utilizing recycled textiles and fibers. As a high‐investment product, the IS sofa requires a significant financial commitment and involves complex decision‐making, an area less studied compared with other sustainable goods categories. This study proposes a model that integrates the sociopsychological dimensions of the Theory of Planned Behavior with a rational choice perspective, incorporating green perceived utility, perceived value, and trade‐off acceptance. Survey data from 1150 Italian consumers reveal that trade‐off acceptance, green perceived utility, environmental concern, perceived value, and subjective norms significantly influence purchase intention. This study contributes to the literature on consumer behavior at the intersection of IS and complex purchases, providing a novel perspective on sustainable consumption. Additionally, it offers several directions for future research and practical recommendations for managers and policymakers to enhance the adoption of sustainable, high‐investment products, supporting the transition to a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Maria Dangelico & Luca Fraccascia & Valerio Schiaroli, 2026. "Merging Psychological, Social, and Rational Perspectives: A Study of the Determinants of Consumer Choices for Sustainable Furniture," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 4985-4999, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4985-4999
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70428
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4985-4999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.