IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p4846-4860.html

Applying High Reliability Organisation Theory to Guide Implementation of the Global Industry Standard for Tailings Management (GISTM)

Author

Listed:
  • Layla Howe
  • Claire Cote
  • Susan Johnston

Abstract

Unreliable tailings management performance can result in serious, sometimes irreversible environmental, social and economic harm. The Global Industry Standard for Tailings Management (GISTM), being implemented by some mining companies, represents a potential turning point towards safer, more sustainable tailings storage. Although there has been over 30 years of research describing the practices that High Reliability Organisations (HROs) sustain to remain free from catastrophic failure and routinely fulfil their performance goals, this knowledge is yet to be applied to tailings management. In this study, we used Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) methods and HRO thinking to consider how GISTM requirements can be operationalised with high reliability. We found examples where GISTM guides the development of organisational practices that enable greater reliability in the delivery of desired Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) performance. However, GISTM provides limited or no guidance aligning with some hallmark HRO characteristics, primarily a collective mindset and commitment to resilience. We argue that companies will need to develop and sustain additional approaches if all GISTM requirements are to be implemented with high reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Layla Howe & Claire Cote & Susan Johnston, 2026. "Applying High Reliability Organisation Theory to Guide Implementation of the Global Industry Standard for Tailings Management (GISTM)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 4846-4860, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4846-4860
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70427
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:4846-4860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.