IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p4360-4375.html

Addressing Symbolic Versus Substantive Disclosures Under CSRD/ESRS E5 in the Circular Economy Disclosure of the Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Dominika Hadro
  • Davide Calandra
  • Justyna Fijalkowska
  • Michele Oppioli
  • Silvana Secinaro

Abstract

This study examines how European automotive companies disclose circular economy (CE) information in light of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) E5. Using a mixed‐methods, data‐driven approach that combines keyword analysis and latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modelling on 53 corporate sustainability reports, the research identifies the main CE disclosure themes and evaluates their alignment with ESRS E5 requirements. Results reveal a strong dominance of symbolic communication, focused on compliance rhetoric and waste management, over substantive disclosures that reflect genuine engagement with circular strategies such as reuse, remanufacturing or regeneration. The findings expose the sector's limited preparedness for the new EU sustainability reporting framework and highlight a persistent reliance on linear production models. The study offers empirical evidence on the symbolic–substantive dichotomy in CE reporting and provides actionable insights for policymakers, regulators and firms aiming to strengthen substantive sustainability disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominika Hadro & Davide Calandra & Justyna Fijalkowska & Michele Oppioli & Silvana Secinaro, 2026. "Addressing Symbolic Versus Substantive Disclosures Under CSRD/ESRS E5 in the Circular Economy Disclosure of the Automotive Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4360-4375, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4360-4375
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70412
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4360-4375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.