IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3898-3922.html

Manipulators or Innovators? Corporate Misconduct and Green Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Qifeng Zhao
  • Javier Cifuentes‐Faura
  • Long Wang
  • Qianfeng Luo

Abstract

An ongoing debate in the literature is whether rule‐breaking actors are more innovative than others. This study examines how corporate misconduct influences green innovation. We find that firms involved in misconduct experience a 14.7% reduction in green patent quantity and a 20.4% decrease in citations, demonstrating a detrimental effect on green innovation. This adverse impact is more pronounced within firms characterized by lower transparency, higher default risk, independent central research institutes, stronger top management team power, and weaker local intellectual property protection. Our findings remain robust and consistent when implementing change analysis and instrumental variable approach. Further analysis indicates that corporate misconduct primarily inhibits green innovation by fostering a culture of dishonesty, releasing signals, and reducing human capital. Our findings contribute to the literature gap by establishing a direct link between corporate misconduct and green innovation, offering new insights into how dishonesty undermines long‐term strategic capabilities in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Qifeng Zhao & Javier Cifuentes‐Faura & Long Wang & Qianfeng Luo, 2026. "Manipulators or Innovators? Corporate Misconduct and Green Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3898-3922, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3898-3922
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70361
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3898-3922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.