IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3790-3812.html

Does Where We Live Influence How Green We Act? Urban Expansion and Climate Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohang Ren
  • Yu ling
  • Alessia Palma
  • Benye Shi

Abstract

As climate‐related risks intensify, corporate environmental information disclosure (EID) plays a critical role in environmental governance. This study examines how urban sprawl influences EID quality and the mechanisms behind this relationship. Based on panel data of 4387 listed firms in China from 2010 to 2023, using a text‐mined EID score alongside a remote‐sensing sprawl index, we show that spatially fragmented governance motivates firms to substitute reputational assurance for regulatory compliance. This effect is moderated by city‐level regulatory pressure, carbon reduction performance, firm‐level environmental performance, and executive environmental awareness. Further examination indicates that state‐owned, tech‐intensive firms, as well as those based in central and western areas, experience a more substantial effect. Grounded in institutional theory, legitimacy theory, and the reputation management perspective, this study develops a conceptual framework linking urban spatial structure to corporate environmental behavior. The findings extend the external governance perspective in EID research and provide practical implications for strengthening regulatory responses in spatially dispersed urban areas and promoting corporate green transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohang Ren & Yu ling & Alessia Palma & Benye Shi, 2026. "Does Where We Live Influence How Green We Act? Urban Expansion and Climate Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3790-3812, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3790-3812
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3790-3812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.