IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3672-3690.html

Circular Economy Disclosure and ESG Performance: Signal, Substance, or Symbol?

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Leggerini
  • Martina Percuoco
  • Irene Ricciardi
  • Anna Prisco

Abstract

The study examines whether circular economy (CE) disclosures lead to tangible environmental improvements reflected in ESG performance or primarily serve reputational objectives linked to greenwashing. It investigates how disclosures on energy efficiency, resource reduction, water efficiency, and emission reduction influence ESG performance and whether external audits enhance disclosure credibility. Using a quantitative design, the analysis covers 1247 European firms (2015–2024) with data from Thomson Reuters, sustainability reports, and Orbis. Multiple regression models assess the relationship between CE disclosures and ESG performance, considering the moderating role of external audits. CE disclosures are positively associated with ESG performance, with energy efficiency and resource reduction showing the strongest effects. Water and emission disclosures also yield positive impacts, though the former is weakened when paired with external audits. Overall, external audits are positively related to ESG performance and strengthen the effect of energy and emission disclosures but may reduce the effectiveness of water‐related disclosures, highlighting the need for context‐specific assurance strategies. This study contributes to the debate on greenwashing by showing that external verification can strengthen the effectiveness of CE disclosures in improving ESG performance. It underscores the importance of transparent and verifiable reporting for corporate governance, investment decisions, and policy frameworks promoting genuine environmental progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Leggerini & Martina Percuoco & Irene Ricciardi & Anna Prisco, 2026. "Circular Economy Disclosure and ESG Performance: Signal, Substance, or Symbol?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3672-3690, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3672-3690
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70334
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    2. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571011080144 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Christopher Marquis & Michael W. Toffel & Yanhua Zhou, 2016. "Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 483-504, April.
    4. Stephen A. Ross, 1977. "The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive-Signalling Approach," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 8(1), pages 23-40, Spring.
    5. Randy Priem & Andrea Gabellone, 2024. "The impact of a firm’s ESG score on its cost of capital: can a high ESG score serve as a substitute for a weaker legal environment," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 676-703, January.
    6. He, Feng & Guo, Xinyao & Yue, Pengpeng, 2024. "Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Richard Paul Gregory, 2024. "The influence of firm size on ESG score controlling for ratings agency and industrial sector," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 86-99, January.
    8. Chiara Leggerini & Mariasole Bannò, 2025. "From Tweets to Insights: Social Opinion Mining on Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 5996-6015, September.
    9. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2010. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 829-846, September.
    10. Magali Delmas & Michael W. Toffel, 2004. "Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 209-222, July.
    11. Yu‐Lin Chen & Mei‐Chu Huang, 2023. "Water usage reduction and CSR committees: Taiwan evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1070-1081, May.
    12. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    13. Xuhui Peng & Xinjian Cui & Yunqian Bai & Yanjing Xu, 2023. "Institutional isomorphism pressure and multinational corporations’ environmental and social performance," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(17), pages 2424-2434, October.
    14. Xuemeng Guo & Ke Guo & Lingpeng Kong, 2023. "Industrial Agglomeration and Corporate ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence from Manufacturing and Producer Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Yin, Yikun & Qian, Yijia & Wang, Liang & Lu, Yichun, 2024. "Common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Addisu A. Lashitew, 2021. "Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 184-200, March.
    17. Kirchherr, Julian & Piscicelli, Laura & Bour, Ruben & Kostense-Smit, Erica & Muller, Jennifer & Huibrechtse-Truijens, Anne & Hekkert, Marko, 2018. "Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 264-272.
    18. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger, 2010. "Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 829-846, September.
    19. Christine Oliver, 1997. "Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and resource‐based views," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(9), pages 697-713, October.
    20. Reginald Masocha & Olawale Fatoki, 2018. "The Role of Mimicry Isomorphism in Sustainable Development Operationalisation by SMEs in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    21. Giovanna Michelon & Michelle Rodrigue, 2015. "Demand for CSR: Insights from Shareholder Proposals," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 157-175, December.
    22. Deshuai Hou & Junnan Yan & Qiong Sun & Ying Chen, 2024. "Short-selling and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 443-483, December.
    23. Prisco, Anna & Ricciardi, Irene & Percuoco, Martina & Basile, Vincenzo, 2025. "Sustainability-driven fashion: Unpacking generation Z’s second-hand clothing purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    24. Huang, Zhi-xiong & Yang, Xiandong, 2021. "Carbon emissions and firm innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 503-513.
    25. Qiang Liang & Xinchun Li & Xueru Yang & Danming Lin & Danhui Zheng, 2013. "How does family involvement affect innovation in China?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 677-695, September.
    26. Robyn Moroney & Carolyn Windsor & Yong Ting Aw, 2012. "Evidence of assurance enhancing the quality of voluntary environmental disclosures: an empirical analysis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(3), pages 903-939, September.
    27. Francesco Testa & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Marco Frey, 2018. "Does it pay to be a greenwasher or a brownwasher?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1104-1116, November.
    28. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2008. "Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 303-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazi Abul Bashar Muhammad Afzal Hossain & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & George Giannopoulos, 2026. "Environmental Performance Drivers: A Political Cost Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4102-4147, March.
    2. Kameleddine B. Benameur & Mohamed M. Mostafa & Ahmed Hassanein & Mohammed Z. Shariff & Wasim Al-Shattarat, 2024. "Sustainability reporting scholarly research: a bibliometric review and a future research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 823-866, June.
    3. Wei, Yufen & Tang, Jinghua & He, Hongbo & Wu, Chanjun & Lin, Muyangzi & Xie, Haonan, 2025. "Customer concentration and corporate greenwashing," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Birindelli, Giuliana & Chiappini, Helen & Jalal, Raja Nabeel-Ud-Din, 2024. "Greenwashing, bank financial performance and the moderating role of gender diversity," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Ouissal El Aziz & Abdelkarim Asdiou, 2025. "AI-powered analysis of ESG disclosure: a clustering approach to determinants and motivations," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Md. Sumon Hossain & Mst. Hasna Banu & Sumi Saha & Md. Mahofuzur Rahman, 2026. "Environmental reporting and financial performance of listed Islamic Banks in Bangladesh: Evidence from Shariah-Based institutions," International Journal of Business and Management (IJBM), International Emerging Scholars Society (IESS), New Zealand, vol. 5(1), pages 737-771, May.
    8. Shoaib Aslam & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Ramiz Ur Rehman & Collins G. Ntim, 2021. "Environmental management practices and financial performance using data envelopment analysis in Japan: The mediating role of environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1655-1673, May.
    9. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Nazim Hussain & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Does it reduce decoupling practices?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 118-138, January.
    10. Giorgia Maria D'Allura & Mariasole Bannò & Chiara Leggerini & Federica Romano, 2026. "When Diversity Meets Family Owners: ESG Performance in European Publicly Listed Firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 1912-1931, March.
    11. Benedikt Unger & Michael Nippa, 2024. "Determinants of firms' initiative and inertia in pursuing climate neutrality strategies—Theoretical explanations and empirical evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4086-4107, July.
    12. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    13. Xiao, Xinning & Shailer, Greg, 2022. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors affecting the credibility of sustainability reports," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    14. Lena Klaaßen & Christian Lohmüller & Bjarne Steffen, 2024. "Assessing corporate climate action: Corporate climate policies and company-level emission reductions," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(11), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Liu, Siwen & Heijden, Hans van der, 2025. "Self-regulation and self-presentation in sustainability reporting: Evidence from firms’ voluntary water disclosure," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    16. Jesus Valero‐Gil & Tiberio Daddi & Sabina Scarpellini & Luca Marrucci, 2024. "Determinants and benefits of over‐certification: A signaling theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5984-5999, November.
    17. Hilton, Joshua, 2025. "An integrated analysis of greenhush," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    18. van Oorschot, Kim E. & Aas Johansen, Vilde & Lynes Thorup, Nanna & Aspen, Dina Margrethe, 2024. "Standardization cycles in sustainability reporting within the Global Reporting Initiative," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 492-502.
    19. Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2024. "Literature review of greenwashing research: State of the art," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5343-5356, November.
    20. Pengyu Chen & Abd Alwahed Dagestani, 2023. "Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2330-2343, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3672-3690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.