IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3655-3671.html

Strategic Marketing Tensions in Sustainable Business Models: A Conceptual Approach Through Customer Value Propositions and Stewardship

Author

Listed:
  • Päivi Petänen

Abstract

Sustainable business models (SBMs) inherently involve tensions, which are contradictory or misaligned demands that companies must consider simultaneously. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the relevance and linkage of these tensions to strategic marketing considerations, including positioning, competitiveness, differentiation, and a company's interaction with customers. This study aims to identify a set of tensions that arise in the strategic marketing of SBMs and to explore how these tensions can be responded to by companies. The study adopts a conceptual methodology, applying customer value propositions (CVPs) as a structured strategic marketing lens to explore tensions. Further, stewardship is suggested as an ontological approach that shapes the strategic marketing responses to tensions for the collective good of future generations. The resulting framework outlines how companies can embrace SBM tensions, including their hierarchical intensity, make sense of complexity and address the dominance of unsustainable models through strategic marketing mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Päivi Petänen, 2026. "Strategic Marketing Tensions in Sustainable Business Models: A Conceptual Approach Through Customer Value Propositions and Stewardship," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3655-3671, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3655-3671
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70327
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Payne & Pennie Frow & Andreas Eggert, 2017. "The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 467-489, July.
    2. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    3. Morela Hernandez, 2008. "Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 121-128, June.
    4. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    5. Claire Beach & Sitong Michelle Chen & Michael S. W. Lee, 2025. "Developing consumers’ paradox mindsets: Making sense of tensions in sustainability," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 289-300, June.
    6. Hinterhuber, Andreas, 2017. "Value quantification capabilities in industrial markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 163-178.
    7. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.
    8. Jodie Conduit & Ingo Oswald Karpen & Taylor Willmott, 2023. "User circularity practices: Adopting a user stewardship perspective for a circular economy," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 211-231, December.
    9. van der Meer, M. & Schruff-Lim, E.M. & Onwezen, M.C. & Fischer, A.R.H., 2025. "“Planting†meat substitutes in the meat shelf: An online and two supermarket field experiments to explore the effect of placing meat substitutes next to meat," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. F. Chapin & Steward Pickett & Mary Power & Robert Jackson & David Carter & Clifford Duke, 2011. "Earth stewardship: a strategy for social–ecological transformation to reverse planetary degradation," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 44-53, March.
    11. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    12. Marina Gigliotti & Andrea Runfola, 2022. "A stakeholder perspective on managing tensions in hybrid organizations: Analyzing fair trade for a sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3198-3215, November.
    13. Nancy M. P. Bocken & Laura Niessen & Maike Gossen & Ankita Das & Maria Zielińska, 2025. "Marketing in the anthropocene: A future agenda for research and practice," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 23-47, June.
    14. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    15. Rintamäki, Timo & Kirves, Kaisa, 2017. "From perceptions to propositions: Profiling customer value across retail contexts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 159-167.
    16. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jodie Conduit & Ingo Oswald Karpen & Taylor Willmott, 2023. "User circularity practices: Adopting a user stewardship perspective for a circular economy," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 211-231, December.
    2. Mark Peterson & Bård Tronvoll & Julia Fehrer, 2025. "Theories of sustainability: Re-imagining a marketing-indigenous understanding of sustainability," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 3-22, June.
    3. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, 2024. "Sustainability leadership: An integrative review and conceptual synthesis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2849-2867, May.
    4. Annika Mies & Tim Gruchmann & Stefan Gold, 2026. "Conceptualising the Socio-material Context: An Ethical Enquiry into the Contextual Materialisation of Paradoxes in Transport Logistics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 107-139, January.
    5. Archana Mishra & Lance Newey & Paul Spee, 2025. "Greatest Good for the Greatest Number – the Role of Managers’ Ethical Meaning-Making and Subjective Wellbeing Complexity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 557-579, March.
    6. Roth, Steffen & Sales, Augusto & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2025. "Value plurality and multifunctional commensuration in organisation: A systems‐theoretical approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 553-562.
    7. Martin Ritter & Heiner Schanz, 2021. "Carsharing Business Models’ Strategizing Mindsets Regarding Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Suparak Suriyankietkaew & Phallapa Petison, 2019. "A Retrospective and Foresight: Bibliometric Review of International Research on Strategic Management for Sustainability, 1991–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Ologeanu-Taddei, Roxana & Hönigsberg, Sarah & Weritz, Pauline & Wache, Hendrik & Mittermeier, Ferdinand & Tana, Silviana & Dang, Duong & Hautala-Kankaanpää, Tuire & Pekkola, Samuli, 2025. "The relationship of digital transformation and corporate sustainability: Synergies and tensions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Ilyas, Imran M. & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy, 2022. "Exploring the impact of sustainable value proposition on firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 729-740.
    11. Surajit Bag, 2025. "Deconstructing Tensions in the Adoption of Digital Innovation in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Qualitative Study," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8008-8024, December.
    12. Alin Stancu & Alina Filip & Mihai Ioan Roșca & Daniela Ioniță & Raluca Căplescu & Andrei Cânda & Laura Daniela Roșca, 2020. "Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic Options for Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Ashman Shahrudin Bin Khairuddin, 2025. "Steering Through Multi-Level Contradictions: Paradoxical Leadership in the Sustainability Transition of Malaysian Higher Education," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(3), pages 172-183.
    14. Chonlawan Thammaraksa & Michael Zwicky Hauschild & Caroline Aggestam Pontoppidan & Alexis Laurent, 2025. "What Is a Sustainable Company?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3635-3655, March.
    15. Marek Jabłoński, 2018. "Value Migration to the Sustainable Business Models of Digital Economy Companies on the Capital Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-42, August.
    16. Kullak, Franziska S. & Baker, Jonathan J. & Woratschek, Herbert, 2021. "Enhancing value creation in social purpose organizations: Business models that leverage networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 630-642.
    17. Rikke Rønholt Albertsen, 2025. "The Legitimacy–Commitment Paradox in Corporate Sustainability Strategy Formulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2863-2881, March.
    18. Päivi Petänen & Henna Sundqvist & Maria Antikainen, 2024. "Deconstructing Customer Value Propositions for the Circular Product-as-a-Service Business Model: A Case Study from the Textile Industry," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1631-1653, September.
    19. Rolf Findsrud & Martin Hanssen & David Sörhammar, 2025. "Toward a theory of sustainable resource integration," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 142-156, June.
    20. Rintamäki, Timo & Saarijärvi, Hannu, 2021. "An integrative framework for managing customer value propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 754-764.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3655-3671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.