IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3561-3606.html

Does ESG Investing Pay off? Comparing the Performance of ESG and Traditional ETFs Across European and US Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Tenorio‐Salgueiro
  • Andrea Martínez‐Salgueiro
  • Rubén Lado‐Sestayo
  • Milagros Vivel‐Búa

Abstract

Investors have long recognized the importance of firms in promoting sustainability, leading to the rise of socially responsible investment (SRI). Specifically, there is a growing preference for exchange‐traded funds (ETFs) that prioritize environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles. However, the performance of ESG ETFs has not been extensively studied, and existing findings remain inconclusive. This research addresses this gap by comparing ESG ETFs with traditional ETFs in Europe and the United States, analyzing the period 2014–2024, along with subperiods of pre‐crisis (2014–2019) and crisis (2020–2024). The results show that ESG ETFs can offer diversification benefits, hedging capabilities, and safe‐haven properties. However, performance outcomes vary across regions, investment strategies, and market conditions. In Europe, ESG ETFs improve risk‐adjusted performance in utility‐maximizing strategies. In the United States, ESG ETFs also enhance returns adjusted for risk in utility‐maximizing portfolios during periods of market stress, though this advantage is less evident in more stable market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Tenorio‐Salgueiro & Andrea Martínez‐Salgueiro & Rubén Lado‐Sestayo & Milagros Vivel‐Búa, 2026. "Does ESG Investing Pay off? Comparing the Performance of ESG and Traditional ETFs Across European and US Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3561-3606, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3561-3606
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70309
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3561-3606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.