IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3280-3300.html

Operationalising Sufficiency in an Organisational Context: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Shahrokh Nikou
  • Erik‐Jan Hultink
  • Nancy M. P. Bocken

Abstract

Efficiency‐led sustainability is important but often fails to deliver absolute reductions in resource use, leaving organisations exposed to rebound effects. What remains underexplored is how sufficiency, the strategic limitation of consumption and resource use, is operationalised within organisational contexts. We address this gap through a systematic review of 70 peer‐reviewed studies, using the Structure‐Conduct‐Performance (SCP) framework to connect enabling conditions, organisational practices and sustainability performance. We identify eight thematic clusters reflecting how sufficiency is enacted across domains such as governance and policy, organisational practices, social norms and infrastructural systems. Building on these, we develop a typology of five strategic types through which organisations operationalise sufficiency. This paper (1) adds a system‐level perspective that bridges structural, strategic and performance domains; (2) extends the SCP framework as a theory‐building lens to expose misalignments that hinder sufficiency transitions; and (3) highlights tensions that challenge dominant assumptions in sustainability‐oriented organisational strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahrokh Nikou & Erik‐Jan Hultink & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2026. "Operationalising Sufficiency in an Organisational Context: A Systematic Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3280-3300, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3280-3300
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3280-3300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.