IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p3149-3176.html

Are Philanthropic Firms Climate‐Friendly? The Role of Ethical Posture

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Uyar
  • Nohade Nasrallah
  • Cemil Kuzey
  • Abdullah S. Karaman

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between corporate philanthropy and environmental performance, with the moderating effect of the ethical posture of firms. Using country–industry–year fixed effect regression on an international dataset spanning nine sectors and 44 countries from 2002 to 2021, we test two hypotheses: the synergy hypothesis, where philanthropy enhances environmental performance (supported by positive associations with aggregate performance, carbon emissions, and resource consumption), and the trade‐off hypothesis, where it hinders eco‐innovation. Additionally, we examine the moderating role of ethical posture and find a positive influence on the relationship between philanthropy and environmental performance for aggregate performance, carbon emissions, and eco‐innovation, but not for resource consumption. Subgroup analyses reveal variations across high‐ versus low‐Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) countries, polluting versus non‐polluting sectors, US versus non‐US samples, strong versus weak governance firms, and early versus late periods. These findings offer valuable implications for regulatory bodies, policymakers, companies, and governments in aligning philanthropy with sustainable outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Uyar & Nohade Nasrallah & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2026. "Are Philanthropic Firms Climate‐Friendly? The Role of Ethical Posture," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 3149-3176, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3149-3176
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70345
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Husam Ananzeh & Hamzeh Al Amosh & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "The effect of corporate governance quality and its mechanisms on firm philanthropic donations: evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 477-501, May.
    2. Hainmueller, Jens, 2012. "Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 25-46, January.
    3. Yan Zhu & Li-Yun Sun & Alicia Leung, 2014. "Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 925-947, December.
    4. Kim, Daehyun & Marin, Michael J. & Richardson, Gordon D. & Salterio, Steven E. & Tsang, Albert, 2023. "Modeling board governance, environmental expertise, and social engagement effects on firm environmental performance: Panel data evidence," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
    5. Nurlan Orazalin & Monowar Mahmood, 2021. "Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3569-3588, December.
    6. Xingqiang Du, 2015. "Is Corporate Philanthropy Used as Environmental Misconduct Dressing? Evidence from Chinese Family-Owned Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 341-361, June.
    7. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    8. Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington, 2008. "Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(12), pages 1325-1343, December.
    9. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    10. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    11. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    12. Zhong, Xi & Chen, Weihong & Ren, Ge, 2022. "The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on emerging-economy firms’ long-term performance: An explanation based on signal theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 345-357.
    13. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2022. "CEO power and the likelihood of paying dividends: Effect of profitability and cash flow volatility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Bryan W. Husted & José De Jesus Salazar, 2006. "Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 75-91, January.
    15. Xingqiang Du & Yingying Chang & Quan Zeng & Yingjie Du & Hongmei Pei, 2016. "Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) weakness, media coverage, and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 551-581, June.
    16. Wu, Bao & Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Hua, Danni, 2021. "Generous charity to preserve green image? Exploring linkage between strategic donations and environmental misconduct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 839-850.
    17. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    18. Archie B. Carroll, 2016. "Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Zahid Hameed & Rana Muhammad Naeem & Tahir Islam & Safiya Mukhtar Alshibani, 2024. "How does CEO ethical leadership transform Saudi SMEs into green firms? A moderated mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3855-3868, September.
    20. Yi Lu & Greg Shailer & Mark Wilson, 2016. "Corporate Political Donations: Influences from Directors’ Networks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 461-481, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, WeiWei & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2024. "ESG and debt structure: Is the nature of this relationship nonlinear?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    3. Zhong, Xi & Chen, Weihong & Ren, Ge, 2022. "The impact of corporate social irresponsibility on emerging-economy firms’ long-term performance: An explanation based on signal theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 345-357.
    4. Liu, Wei & Shao, Xuefeng & De Sisto, Marco & Li, Wen Helena, 2021. "A new approach for addressing endogeneity issues in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Zhang, Kaixia & Li, Weibing, 2024. "Environmental regulations and charitable donations made by polluting companies: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1248-1267.
    6. Ali Uyar & Habiba Al-Shaer & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2026. "Board characteristics and aggressive CSR engagement: Do CSR committees provoke or restrain?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 269-311, January.
    7. Jing Jia & Zhongtian Li, 2022. "Corporate Environmental Performance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 188-200, June.
    8. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    9. Paolo Agnese & Francesca Romana Arduino & Luca Secondi, 2022. "Does Ownership Structure Affect Environmental, Social and Governance Activity? Evidence from the Banking System of an Emerging Economy," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(6), pages 1403-1423, December.
    10. Paolo Capelli & Federica Ielasi & Angeloantonio Russo, 2021. "Forecasting volatility by integrating financial risk with environmental, social, and governance risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1483-1495, September.
    11. Xingqiang Du & Yiqi Zhang & Shaojuan Lai & Hexin Tao, 2024. "How Do Auditors Value Hypocrisy? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 501-533, May.
    12. Heli Wang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Good Deeds Done in Silence: Stakeholder Management and Quiet Giving by Chinese Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 649-674, May.
    13. Woo, Donghyup & Suresh, Nallan C., 2022. "Voluntary agreements for sustainability, resource efficiency & firm performance under the supply chain cooperation policy in South Korea," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    14. Rohan Kumar Mishra & Frank Obenpong Kwabi & Abhijeet Chandra, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Related Party Transaction and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 331-369, October.
    15. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    17. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Li, Ruiqian & Wu, Haiyun & Zhong, Ma & Lan, Hao, 2024. "Strategic tone management in ESG reports and ESG risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    19. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Giaka, Maria & Konstantios, Dimitrios & Patsika, Victoria, 2023. "Firms’ sustainability, financial performance, and regulatory dynamics: Evidence from European firms," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Zhu, Steven X. & Cai, Kelly & Zhu, Hui, 2025. "Is corporate social responsibility priced into Yankee bonds?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:3149-3176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.