IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i2p2930-2944.html

From In‐Role to Extra‐Role: Beneficiary‐Specific Impact Perceptions in Workplace Pro‐Environmental Spillover

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjing Guo
  • Yuan Jiang
  • Kerrie Unsworth

Abstract

Research into spillover of pro‐environmental behavior (PEB) has surged due to its cost‐effective potential to enhance environmental policy and intervention implementation. We extend this work by moving beyond the traditional environmentally focused mechanism and, instead, recognizing the dual nature of in‐role PEBs. Drawing on altruism and prosocial theories, we propose that in‐role PEB leads to both perceived environmental impact and perceived organizational impact, each driving different spillover patterns from in‐role to extra‐role PEB. Specifically, when employees perceive that in‐role PEBs help the environment, positive spillover to subsequent extra‐role PEB occurs; however, when employees perceive that in‐role PEBs help the organization, there will be a curvilinear (U‐shape) relationship to subsequent extra‐role PEBs. Data from 311 employees, collected via an online survey through Prolific across three waves, support these hypotheses. By uncovering distinct spillover patterns tied to perceived impacts on different beneficiaries, this study emphasizes the importance of perceived prosocial impact and provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying the PEB spillover effect beyond environment‐relevant factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjing Guo & Yuan Jiang & Kerrie Unsworth, 2026. "From In‐Role to Extra‐Role: Beneficiary‐Specific Impact Perceptions in Workplace Pro‐Environmental Spillover," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2930-2944, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2930-2944
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70330
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2930-2944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.