IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i2p2526-2546.html

Credit Risk Assessment in the Climate Shadow: Evidence From White and Grey Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Rodolfo Raimondi
  • Paola Gina Maria Schwizer
  • Simona Cosma
  • Giuseppe Rimo

Abstract

Climate change is reshaping financial stability, making climate risk a critical component of banks' risk management. However, the absence of standardized frameworks validated by central authorities hinders banks' ability to integrate climate risk into existing credit risk models. This study employs a bibliometric and systematic literature review approach to examine the existing white and grey literature regarding the impact of climate change on credit risk components, like probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD), exposure at default (EAD), and unexpected loss (UL). We highlight that innovations in climate‐adjusted credit risk estimation primarily stem from grey literature but lack empirical validation in academic research. This study encourages academics to refine climate‐adjusted risk metrics, financial institutions to evaluate their applicability, and policymakers to establish a more coherent regulatory approach. It also offers clarification to bank managers and practitioners on which methodologies are most applicable. Our study explains theoretically how climate risks affect creditworthiness and contributes to the development of standardized methodologies for their consistent integration into risk assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodolfo Raimondi & Paola Gina Maria Schwizer & Simona Cosma & Giuseppe Rimo, 2026. "Credit Risk Assessment in the Climate Shadow: Evidence From White and Grey Literature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2526-2546, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2526-2546
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2526-2546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.