IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i2p2434-2452.html

Sustainability Reporting and Performance: Do Italian Companies Manage Their Narratives in Mandatory Settings?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Chiara Demartini
  • Sara Trucco
  • Valentina Beretta

Abstract

Sustainability disclosure is a topic of growing interest worldwide, especially after the adoption of the Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD), which mandates specific classes of companies in the European Union to disclose a series of information regarding ESG issues. Moreover, due to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, new mandatory EU sustainability reporting standards are required. To our best knowledge, only few studies analyzed the content and the quality of nonfinancial disclosure (NFD) after the NFRD in the Italian context, which represents a relevant share of the EU gross domestic product. The purpose of this paper is to examine how the tone of NFD is associated with firms' nonfinancial performance in mandatory settings. All reports by Italian listed firms disclosing information of years 2017–2023 are analyzed. Content analysis is used to assess the quantity and the quality of NFD, whereas a regression analysis tests the link between the tone of NFD and firms' nonfinancial performance. This paper contributes to the current literature on NFD by analyzing the state of the art of the mandatory NFD in one European country and by verifying the link between the tone of NFD and the firms' nonfinancial performance, after the adoption of the NFRD.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Chiara Demartini & Sara Trucco & Valentina Beretta, 2026. "Sustainability Reporting and Performance: Do Italian Companies Manage Their Narratives in Mandatory Settings?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2434-2452, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2434-2452
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2434-2452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.