IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i2p2395-2417.html

Barriers or Challenges? How European Companies Respond to Barriers to Eco‐Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Donis
  • Jaime Gómez
  • Idana Salazar

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the barriers to eco‐innovation faced by firms. We adopt strategic choice theory as a conceptual framework to examine how perceived barriers influence firms' intentions to eco‐innovate. This framework is relevant for understanding the difference between deterrent barriers, which prevent firms from initiating innovation, and revealed barriers, which emerge during the innovation process. We investigate four commonly identified categories of innovation barriers: financial, knowledge‐based, market‐related and regulatory. The objective is to assess whether they primarily function as deterrents or whether they are revealed as firms engage in the eco‐innovation process. For the empirical analysis, we employ survey data from European firms, pooling observations from 2015, 2017, 2021 and 2024. A distinguishing feature of the dataset is that it captures firms' intentions to undertake further eco‐innovation over the subsequent 2 years, thereby mitigating endogeneity concerns related to reverse causality. Our results indicate that the perception of barriers appears to be positively associated with the intention to eco‐innovate, which suggests that they are revealed rather than deterrent barriers and are part of firms' experiential learning processes. This pattern is consistent across all four barrier categories examined. We further distinguish between the pre‐ and post‐COVID periods and find that the results hold across both temporal contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Donis & Jaime Gómez & Idana Salazar, 2026. "Barriers or Challenges? How European Companies Respond to Barriers to Eco‐Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2395-2417, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2395-2417
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70256
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2395-2417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.