Author
Listed:
- Yaya Su
- Conghao Zhu
- Khaldoon Albitar
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the rapid proliferation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles, the phenomenon of corporate greenwashing has garnered increasing attention. Drawing upon data from A‐share listed companies in China between 2009 and 2022, this study investigates how competitive pressure influences corporate greenwashing in the ESG domain. Market competition is measured by the number of newly registered firms at the city‐industry level, while a greenwashing index is constructed based on the deviation between ESG disclosure scores and actual performance ratings. Employing a range of empirical methods, including two‐way fixed effects models and instrumental variable approaches, the analysis reveals that the entry of new firms significantly intensifies greenwashing behavior among incumbent enterprises. This effect primarily operates through the erosion of managerial confidence and the amplification of short‐termism. However, executives with strong environmental awareness or sustainability‐related backgrounds, as well as robust ESG disclosure mechanisms, can partially mitigate this tendency. External forces such as institutional investors' on‐site investigations, media oversight, and government regulation also exert a restraining influence. The study contributes to the literature by being the first to systematically assess the impact of new entrants on ESG greenwashing from the perspective of dynamic market structure and by introducing managerial confidence as a mediating mechanism. These findings offer a novel interpretive framework for understanding the strategic distortion of ESG initiatives and provide practical insights for policymakers seeking to combat greenwashing and for firms striving toward authentic green transformation under intensifying competition.
Suggested Citation
Yaya Su & Conghao Zhu & Khaldoon Albitar, 2026.
"Market Competition and Corporate ESG Greenwashing: A Perspective From New Entrants,"
Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2266-2294, February.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2266-2294
DOI: 10.1002/bse.70282
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2266-2294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.