IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i2p2103-2121.html

Echoes of Environmental Performance: How Firms Respond to Feedback in the Shadow of Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Lee

Abstract

Environmental performance feedback (EPF) triggers cognitive processes that influence corporate decision‐making, yet how firms translate this feedback into environmental information disclosure (EID) remains unexplored. Drawing on behavioral and legitimacy perspectives, we examine the associations of positive and negative performance feedback with EID levels and the moderating effect of regulatory stringency. Analyzing a dataset of 875 observations from 175 global manufacturers, we find that both positive and negative performance feedback increases EID levels. Crucially, these associations weaken under higher regulatory stringency. Our evidence indicates that EPF guides firms' disclosure strategies by indicating opportunities or threats to their legitimacy. Meanwhile, stringent environmental regulations establish a minimum baseline of social acceptance, thereby reducing the need for firms to engage in extensive disclosure to preserve their legitimacy. The results clarify the decision‐making dynamics that link EPF to EID and reveal how the regulatory condition moderates these disclosure behaviors, suggesting practical implications for firms seeking to balance compliance and legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Lee, 2026. "Echoes of Environmental Performance: How Firms Respond to Feedback in the Shadow of Regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2103-2121, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2103-2121
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:2:p:2103-2121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.