IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p926-944.html

Sustainability Paradoxes in Supply Chains: Analyzing the Effects of Public and Private Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Lena Petri
  • Stefan Seuring

Abstract

Implementing public and private sustainability regulations in supply chains (SCs) often generates tensions between actors, goals, and processes. This study applies paradox theory to identify key sustainability‐related tensions and management strategies, and to explore their implications for sustainable SC management (SSCM). A systematic literature review of 60 journal articles was conducted using MAXQDA and SPSS. Findings reveal that public regulations act both as sources of tension and as tools for managing them, especially amid conflicting stakeholder perspectives. However, SSCM‐related strategies remain underrepresented in current debates. Multi‐stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) and social sustainability outcomes are central, particularly under public regulation. While systematic literature reviews involve inherent biases, this study contributes by mapping the interplay of regulations, tensions, and SSCM outcomes. It calls for empirical research to test these insights, especially regarding underexplored tensions and stakeholder roles, to improve regulatory enforcement, governance, and sustainable business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lena Petri & Stefan Seuring, 2026. "Sustainability Paradoxes in Supply Chains: Analyzing the Effects of Public and Private Regulations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 926-944, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:926-944
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70199
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:926-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.