IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p759-776.html

Shades of Green Labeling: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roopali Bhatnagar
  • Malgorzata Krzywonos
  • Agnieszka Piekara
  • Efthymios Altsitsiadis

Abstract

Sustainability labels are a signal of firms' commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) related goals and can be driven by firms' ESG strategy. There is a multitude of labeling schemes leading to calls for either a simplified, overarching sustainability label or greater harmonization across the existing labels. Research has examined diverse issues related to sustainability labeling over the years, but primarily with a consumer focus. The present bibliometric study aims to address this imbalance and take stock of the literature on sustainability labeling from a business perspective during 2000–2023, using both Scopus and Web of Science. Our systematic search strategy results in 419 research articles, which are analyzed using bibliometric measures like thematic mapping, document co‐citation analysis, and bibliographic coupling analysis. Findings reveal five themes in the literature—overall impact of sustainability labels; labels influencing firms' sustainability strategy and product innovation; labels and greenwashing; sector‐specific research; and governance of sustainability standards and credibility‐related concerns. We conclude with a discussion and avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Roopali Bhatnagar & Malgorzata Krzywonos & Agnieszka Piekara & Efthymios Altsitsiadis, 2026. "Shades of Green Labeling: A Bibliometric Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 759-776, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:759-776
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70198
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:759-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.