IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p737-758.html

How Can Digital Platforms Resolve Market Failures to Foster a Circular Economy?

Author

Listed:
  • Ässia Boukhatmi
  • Wim Van Opstal

Abstract

Market failures—such as asymmetric information, incomplete markets, externalities, and market power—present major barriers to a circular economy (CE) transition. Although government intervention is traditionally proposed, this paper examines the potential of digital platforms, particularly software‐as‐a‐service (SaaS) business‐to‐business (B2B) models, to address such failures. Drawing on semistructured interviews with platform users, owners, and policy experts across Europe, this study develops and validates a conceptual framework that explains how platforms may resolve, moderate, or generate market failures. The findings show that SaaS platforms can improve transparency, reduce transaction costs, and help internalize externalities but may also introduce new risks, including data asymmetries, user lock‐in, and market concentration. The analysis examines how platform ownership and design features influence strategic interactions among ecosystem actors and affect platform outcomes in CE contexts. This paper contributes to CE and platform governance theory and offers practical insights for EU policy and practice on enabling circular ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ässia Boukhatmi & Wim Van Opstal, 2026. "How Can Digital Platforms Resolve Market Failures to Foster a Circular Economy?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 737-758, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:737-758
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:737-758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.