IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p615-633.html

Linking Responsible Innovation and Nonfinancial Reporting: Evidence From Manufacturing SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Marika Intenza
  • Teresa Turzo
  • Antonio Netti
  • Giacomo Marzi

Abstract

For small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs), engagement in nonfinancial reporting (NFR) often reflects a commitment to accountability, yet the engagement in NFR remains lower than that of large firms. Given SMEs' widespread presence across markets, clarifying the determinants of their reporting behaviour is a relevant research objective. Guided by an integrated framework that combines stakeholder theory (ST) with dynamic capability theory (DCT), this study assesses whether responsible innovation (RI) raises SMEs' propensity to engage in NFR. Environmental innovation ambidexterity (EIA) and entrepreneurial orientation (EO) are modelled as mediators, while stakeholder pressure is posited as an antecedent to RI. Survey data from 559 SME managers are analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS‐SEM). The structural estimates reveal a positive association between RI and NFR engagement. RI also stimulates both EIA and EO, and each mediator exhibits a significant indirect effect on NFR. Stakeholder pressure displays a substantive positive link with RI. These findings extend current discussions on SME sustainability disclosure by highlighting the relevance of RI and its capability‐based mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Marika Intenza & Teresa Turzo & Antonio Netti & Giacomo Marzi, 2026. "Linking Responsible Innovation and Nonfinancial Reporting: Evidence From Manufacturing SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 615-633, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:615-633
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70194
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:615-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.