IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p515-548.html

Carbon‐Cutting Chess: Strategizing Resilient Low‐Carbon Investments for Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Mohammed

Abstract

This research presents a novel empirical and analytical method for strategizing low‐carbon investment strategies (LCIS) in supply chains, viewed through the lens of sustainable and resilient efficiency. The study develops a clear, actionable framework for identifying, evaluating, and implementing LCIS by using a mixed‐methods design. This design integrates focus groups and surveys with 27 industry experts and validates the findings through semistructured interviews. It identifies critical LCIS and tailored success factors that are central to assessing sustainability and resilience outcomes. Key factors derived from expert insights, such as collaborative agility, regulatory adaptability, and support for technological innovation, are highlighted as essential enablers of success. The results indicate that strategies like circular economy practices and the transition to renewable energy are immediate priorities for achieving sustainability and resilience efficiency. In contrast, other strategies, such as lifecycle emission analysis and carbon offsetting programs, demonstrate more sector‐specific or specialized impacts, necessitating tailored approaches in practice. Furthermore, the orientation of evaluation, whether prioritizing sustainability, resilience, or overall performance, should be explicitly aligned with the organization's strategic objectives. This is important because the relative ranking of each strategy may vary depending on the chosen performance focus, thus emphasizing the need to define strategic priorities early on. A significant finding is the misalignment between expert perceptions and quantitative assessments, particularly in cases where specific strategies (e.g., carbon offsetting) received lower empirical rankings despite being highly regarded by practitioners. This emphasizes the value of integrating expert judgment with analytical methods to enhance strategic relevance and prioritization. Finally, the research provides practical recommendations for supply chain professionals and policymakers, advocating for the adoption of adaptable, context‐sensitive LCIS that foster long‐term resilience in the face of climate challenges and global market uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Mohammed, 2026. "Carbon‐Cutting Chess: Strategizing Resilient Low‐Carbon Investments for Supply Chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 515-548, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:515-548
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:515-548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.