IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p213-236.html

Is the Devil in the Details? The Impact of ESG Controversy Materiality on Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Karr
  • Jangwoon Kim
  • Taewoo Roh

Abstract

This study explores the consequences of material and immaterial environmental, social, and governance (ESG) controversies on a firm's financial performance and examines whether a country's regulatory quality contextually moderates this relationship. Using a sample of 7136 internationally listed firms from 2014 to 2022, we find that while the market imposes penalties on firms for material ESG controversies, it does not appear to do so for immaterial ones. Our study also finds that the regulatory quality in a firm's home country intensifies the adverse effects of material ESG controversies on firm performance. We present findings and interpret them within existing theoretical frameworks, particularly through the lenses of signaling theory and institutional theory. While prior literature has presented mixed findings regarding the impact of ESG controversies on firm performance, our study outlines potentially important drivers behind these conflicting outcomes and provides new insights to the nonmarket strategy field through our consideration of the nature of ESG controversies and key country‐level influences.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Karr & Jangwoon Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2026. "Is the Devil in the Details? The Impact of ESG Controversy Materiality on Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 213-236, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:213-236
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70179
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:213-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.