IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p1495-1513.html

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Mobile Phones: An Adaptive Choice‐Based Conjoint and Market Simulation Approach Testing a Multi‐Level Eco‐Score

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Bergener
  • Kathleen Jacobs
  • Marek Veneny
  • Maike Gossen

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of a multi‐level eco‐score on willingness to pay for sustainable mobile phones. Using adaptive choice‐based conjoint analysis and market simulation, the study evaluates the effectiveness of a traffic light‐colored multi‐level eco‐score in a realistic market scenario. Results reveal that higher eco‐score levels significantly enhance consumer preferences and willingness to pay for sustainable mobile phones, with top‐tier eco‐scores (“A” and “B”) being notably preferred. The study highlights that improvements in eco‐score levels lead to a stronger increase in consumer preference shares compared to other product attributes. Additionally, consumers exhibit a progressively higher willingness to pay for mobile phones with superior eco‐score levels, indicating potential financial benefits for manufacturers investing in higher environmental performance. This study makes an important contribution by addressing the under‐researched area of multi‐level eco‐labelling in consumer electronics and demonstrating the practical relevance of multi‐level labels in influencing market dynamics and driving sustainable consumer behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Bergener & Kathleen Jacobs & Marek Veneny & Maike Gossen, 2026. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Mobile Phones: An Adaptive Choice‐Based Conjoint and Market Simulation Approach Testing a Multi‐Level Eco‐Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1495-1513, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1495-1513
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1495-1513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.