IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p1495-1513.html

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Mobile Phones: An Adaptive Choice‐Based Conjoint and Market Simulation Approach Testing a Multi‐Level Eco‐Score

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Bergener
  • Kathleen Jacobs
  • Marek Veneny
  • Maike Gossen

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of a multi‐level eco‐score on willingness to pay for sustainable mobile phones. Using adaptive choice‐based conjoint analysis and market simulation, the study evaluates the effectiveness of a traffic light‐colored multi‐level eco‐score in a realistic market scenario. Results reveal that higher eco‐score levels significantly enhance consumer preferences and willingness to pay for sustainable mobile phones, with top‐tier eco‐scores (“A” and “B”) being notably preferred. The study highlights that improvements in eco‐score levels lead to a stronger increase in consumer preference shares compared to other product attributes. Additionally, consumers exhibit a progressively higher willingness to pay for mobile phones with superior eco‐score levels, indicating potential financial benefits for manufacturers investing in higher environmental performance. This study makes an important contribution by addressing the under‐researched area of multi‐level eco‐labelling in consumer electronics and demonstrating the practical relevance of multi‐level labels in influencing market dynamics and driving sustainable consumer behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Bergener & Kathleen Jacobs & Marek Veneny & Maike Gossen, 2026. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Mobile Phones: An Adaptive Choice‐Based Conjoint and Market Simulation Approach Testing a Multi‐Level Eco‐Score," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1495-1513, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1495-1513
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70241
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gieri Hinnen & Stefanie Lena Hille & Andreas Wittmer, 2017. "Willingness to Pay for Green Products in Air Travel: Ready for Take‐Off?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 197-208, February.
    2. Verena Sablotny-Wackershauser & Marcel Lichters & Daniel Guhl & Paul Bengart & Bodo Vogt, 2024. "Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 610-633, May.
    3. Tai-Wei Chang & Yu-Shan Chen & Yen-Li Yeh & Hung-Xin Li, 2021. "Sustainable consumption models for customers: investigating the significant antecedents of green purchase behavior from the perspective of information asymmetry," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(9), pages 1668-1688, July.
    4. Pat Auger & Timothy Devinney, 2007. "Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 361-383, December.
    5. Zha, Donglan & Yang, Guanglei & Wang, Wenzhong & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Appliance energy labels and consumer heterogeneity: A latent class approach based on a discrete choice experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Joel Huber & Bryan Orme & Richard Miller, 2007. "Dealing with Product Similarity in Conjoint Simulations," Springer Books, in: Anders Gustafsson & Andreas Herrmann & Frank Huber (ed.), Conjoint Measurement, edition 0, chapter 17, pages 347-362, Springer.
    7. Braun, Alexander & Schmeiser, Hato & Schreiber, Florian, 2016. "On consumer preferences and the willingness to pay for term life insurance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 761-776.
    8. Schleich, Joachim & Durand, Antoine & Brugger, Heike, 2021. "How effective are EU minimum energy performance standards and energy labels for cold appliances?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Manisha Jain & Anand B. Rao & Anand Patwardhan, 2021. "Energy Cost Information and Consumer Decisions: Results from a Choice Experiment on Refrigerator Purchases in India," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(2), pages 252-272, March.
    10. Kim, Junghun & Lee, Hyunjoo & Lee, Jongsu, 2020. "Smartphone preferences and brand loyalty: A discrete choice model reflecting the reference point and peer effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. repec:aen:journl:ej42-2-jain is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Katharina Sammer & Rolf Wüstenhagen, 2006. "The influence of eco‐labelling on consumer behaviour – results of a discrete choice analysis for washing machines," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 185-199, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amaia de Ayala & María del Mar Solà, 2022. "Assessing the EU Energy Efficiency Label for Appliances: Issues, Potential Improvements and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Nakai, Miwa & Yajima, Naonari & Ravago, Majah-Leah, 2025. "Cooling the tropics sustainably: Evidence from a choice experiment on energy efficient air conditioners in the Philippines," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Tan, Fuqiang & Li, Xi & Agarwal, Reeti & Joshi, Yatish & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2024. "Does multilingual packaging influence purchasing in retail segment? Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Schleich, Joachim & Durand, Antoine & Brugger, Heike, 2021. "How effective are EU minimum energy performance standards and energy labels for cold appliances?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Hein, Maren & Goeken, Nils & Kurz, Peter & Steiner, Winfried J., 2022. "Using Hierarchical Bayes draws for improving shares of choice predictions in conjoint simulations: A study based on conjoint choice data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 630-651.
    6. Hafize Nurgul Durmus Senyapar & Bilal Duzgun & Fatih Emre Boran, 2024. "Energy Labels and Consumer Attitudes: A Study among University Staff," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Patrizia Fanasch, 2019. "Survival of the fittest: The impact of eco‐certification and reputation on firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 611-628, May.
    8. Zhang, Yixiang & Song, Bowei, 2023. "Does energy-efficiency label affect appliance price? Empirical analysis of the new national standard air conditioners in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim, 2021. "Effects of rescaling the EU energy label on household preferences for top-rated appliances," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Mahirah Kamaludin & Muhd Azrin Shah Razali & Nazatul Faizah Haron & A. A. Azlina, 2021. "Energy Efficiency Labelling: Investigating Students Preferences and Awareness on the Energy-efficient Electrical Appliances in Hostel," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 11(2), pages 300-308.
    11. He, Shutong & Blasch, Julia & van Beukering, Pieter & Wang, Junfeng, 2022. "Energy labels and heuristic decision-making: The role of cognition and energy literacy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Cheng, Zhiqiang & Zhang, Xiwen & Cai, Jinyang, 2025. "Appliance energy efficiency policies and electricity consumption: Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    13. Nikolai Badenhoop & Max Riedel, 2025. "Fragmented EU Car Labels: How To Achieve Consumer-Friendly Standardization and Transparency?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 563-602, December.
    14. Mazurek, Jessica & Prey, Raul, 2025. "Greening the telecommunications industry – Consumer preferences and surcharges for environmental attributes of mobile phone plans," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    15. Zhang, Yixiang & Li, Juan & Tao, Wenwen, 2021. "Does energy efficiency affect appliance prices? Empirical analysis of air conditioners in China based on propensity score matching," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    17. Yingying Zhang Zhang & Chun Yee Wong & Alessandro Comai, 2024. "Child Labor in Social Media: Exploring a Decade of YouTube Data," Working Papers EMS_2024_04, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    18. Katja H. Brunk & Cara Boer, 2020. "How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 443-458, January.
    19. Charles Cunningham & Ken Deal & Yvonne Chen, 2010. "Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 3(4), pages 257-273, December.
    20. Stefano Ceolotto & Eleanor Denny, 2021. "Putting a new 'spin' on energy labels: measuring the impact of reframing energy efficiency on tumble dryer choices in a multi-country experiment," Trinity Economics Papers tep1521, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1495-1513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.