IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p1288-1301.html

Busy Outside Directors and Carbon Disclosure: When Do Talented Directors Turn Out to Be Incompetent?

Author

Listed:
  • Kazumi Endo

Abstract

This study explores whether busy outside directors (BODs) with a wealth of experience influence carbon disclosure. The data analysis is based on Japanese listed firms—a sample of 2169 firm‐year observations from 2017 to 2023. In line with the reputation hypothesis, where director busyness is considered reflective of greater talent, the findings reveal a positive association between BODs and carbon disclosure practices. The benefits of board interlocks became prominent especially when a higher proportion of BODs viewed the board directorship as more prestigious. However, having BODs aged 75 years or older working in relatively less prestigious directorships was less beneficial. The results suggest that director reputation is a powerful incentive for outside directors and highlight the predicted, empirically elusive, potential risks associated with older directors. They provide important policy implications concerning the contentious topic of board busyness and aging, especially for firms selecting outside directors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazumi Endo, 2026. "Busy Outside Directors and Carbon Disclosure: When Do Talented Directors Turn Out to Be Incompetent?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1288-1301, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1288-1301
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70237
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1288-1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.