IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i1p1239-1254.html

Words That Mean Change: Paradoxical Thinking and Eco‐Efficiency in the Automotive Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Marrone
  • Frank Figge

Abstract

This study uses the automotive industry to investigate the link between paradoxical thinking language in corporate sustainability reports and companies' eco‐efficiency. We hypothesized that different types of paradoxical thinking would be associated with varying eco‐efficiency outcomes. Using ChatGPT to generate a lexicon of paradoxical terms, we analyzed sustainability reports from the automotive industry spanning 2002 to 2022, testing associations with four eco‐efficiency indicators. Our analysis reveals that paradoxical thinking matters, but different forms have varying degrees and forms of impact. Specifically, we find that cautious, conditional, and risk‐aware language correlates with higher eco‐efficiency, while growth‐focused and innovation‐oriented language correlates with lower eco‐efficiency. Companies using deliberative, uncertain language achieve superior environmental and economic balance, while those emphasizing expansion and bold innovation show weaker eco‐efficiency performance. This research suggests that specific language patterns in sustainability reports both reflect and potentially influence practical environmental outcomes, suggesting that paradoxical thinking is not uniform but varies significantly in its environmental consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Marrone & Frank Figge, 2026. "Words That Mean Change: Paradoxical Thinking and Eco‐Efficiency in the Automotive Sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1239-1254, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1239-1254
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:1239-1254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.