IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10155-10184.html

Carbon Neutrality and Business Models: Mixed‐Method Study of Business Strategies and Decarbonization Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Talwar
  • Sai Lan
  • Laura Broccardo
  • Nourah O. Alshaghdali

Abstract

This study adopted a mixed‐method approach to examine decarbonization business models/strategies employed across the energy ecosystem. In study 1, we conducted a systematic literature review of 94 studies to identify business models/strategies mapped to five energy ecosystem contexts—energy systems' transition, energy systems—demand side, energy systems—supply side, renewable alternatives, and electric vehicle batteries. Key identified models include product‐service systems (PSS), one‐stop shops (OSS), heat as a service (HaaS), and vehicle‐to‐grid (V2G), among others. Next, in study 2, we conducted a qualitative study with 19 full‐time employees to examine energy‐related decarbonization pathways implemented by companies in different sectors. Data analysis revealed three dimensions: carbon neutrality approaches, strategic energy transition, and implementation dynamics. Our study contributes by (a) suggesting potential research questions to set the future research agenda and (b) identifying proactive governance, revenue resilience, and multi‐stakeholder value co‐creation as essential foundations for successful energy ecosystem decarbonization.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Talwar & Sai Lan & Laura Broccardo & Nourah O. Alshaghdali, 2025. "Carbon Neutrality and Business Models: Mixed‐Method Study of Business Strategies and Decarbonization Pathways," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10155-10184, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10155-10184
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10155-10184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.