IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10059-10076.html

Implementing Circularity in Organizations by Navigating Institutional Plurality

Author

Listed:
  • Tom B. J. Coenen
  • Nicolaj Frederiksen
  • Leentje Volker
  • Klaasjan Visscher

Abstract

The move towards a circular economy (CE) urges organizations to integrate CE principles into their core processes. This implementation creates tensions between existing institutional configurations and the pressures imposed by redefined principles. By applying an institutional logics framework on an in‐depth case study of a Dutch infrastructure agency, we aim to increase our understanding of how hybrid organizations navigate the transformation to the CE. We specifically examine how the organization manages tensions between existing and emerging institutional logics and found that the interactions among state, project, asset management and societal challenge logics interact in the organization's transformation process. The findings show an organizational shift from a compartmentalization strategy towards a blending strategy, which indicates the need to reconsider organizational structures, roles and processes to foster the systemic changes needed for the organizational implementation of circularity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom B. J. Coenen & Nicolaj Frederiksen & Leentje Volker & Klaasjan Visscher, 2025. "Implementing Circularity in Organizations by Navigating Institutional Plurality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10059-10076, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10059-10076
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10059-10076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.