IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i8p10059-10076.html

Implementing Circularity in Organizations by Navigating Institutional Plurality

Author

Listed:
  • Tom B. J. Coenen
  • Nicolaj Frederiksen
  • Leentje Volker
  • Klaasjan Visscher

Abstract

The move towards a circular economy (CE) urges organizations to integrate CE principles into their core processes. This implementation creates tensions between existing institutional configurations and the pressures imposed by redefined principles. By applying an institutional logics framework on an in‐depth case study of a Dutch infrastructure agency, we aim to increase our understanding of how hybrid organizations navigate the transformation to the CE. We specifically examine how the organization manages tensions between existing and emerging institutional logics and found that the interactions among state, project, asset management and societal challenge logics interact in the organization's transformation process. The findings show an organizational shift from a compartmentalization strategy towards a blending strategy, which indicates the need to reconsider organizational structures, roles and processes to foster the systemic changes needed for the organizational implementation of circularity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom B. J. Coenen & Nicolaj Frederiksen & Leentje Volker & Klaasjan Visscher, 2025. "Implementing Circularity in Organizations by Navigating Institutional Plurality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10059-10076, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10059-10076
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70119
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Perkmann & Maureen McKelvey & Nelson Phillips, 2019. "Protecting Scientists from Gordon Gekko: How Organizations Use Hybrid Spaces to Engage with Multiple Institutional Logics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 298-318, March.
    2. Royston Greenwood & Amalia Magán Díaz & Stan Xiao Li & José Céspedes Lorente, 2010. "The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 521-539, April.
    3. Tom B. J. Coenen & Klaasjan Visscher & Leentje Volker, 2023. "A systemic perspective on transition barriers to a circular infrastructure sector," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 22-43, January.
    4. Xin Pan & Xuanjin Chen & Paresha Sinha & Niannian Dong, 2020. "Are firms with state ownership greener? An institutional complexity view," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 197-211, January.
    5. Durand, Rodolphe & Thornton, Patricia, 2018. "Categorizing Institutional Logics, Institutionalizing Categories: A Review of Two Literatures," HEC Research Papers Series 1276, HEC Paris, revised 30 May 2018.
    6. Joya A. Kemper & C. Michael Hall & Paul W. Ballantine, 2019. "Marketing and Sustainability: Business as Usual or Changing Worldviews?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Venkateshwaran Narayanan & Carol A. Adams, 2017. "Transformative change towards sustainability: the interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 344-368, April.
    8. Sandra van Thiel & Kutsal Yesilkagit, 2011. "Good Neighbours or Distant Friends?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 783-802, September.
    9. José Nederhand & Martijn Van Der Steen & Mark Van Twist, 2019. "Boundary-spanning strategies for aligning institutional logics: a typology," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 219-240, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Xiaojie & Tan, Xiaoxia & Wang, Xiuqiong, 2023. "The institutional logics perspective in management and organizational studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Sang Won Han & Henrich R. Greve, 2026. "The Categorical Imperative vs. Linguistic Alignment: Organizations Use Language to Modify Environmental Expectations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 113-131, January.
    3. Holanda Bruna de Morais & Mendonça Patricia Maria Emerenciano de, 2024. "Analytical Lens for Investigating CSOs and State Relations: The Contributions of Coproduction and Institutional Logics Perspectives," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 27-47, January.
    4. Ivana Milosevic & A. Erin Bass & Ben Schulte, 2023. "The Interplay of Conflicting and Complementing Institutional Logics in Sustainability Practices," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 469-506, June.
    5. Van Dai Nguyen & Thi Thuc Anh Phan & Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen & Quynh Hoa Nguyen & Mai Van Trinh & Sy Long Pham & Hong Nhat Vo, 2023. "Counter-Institutional Identities and Product Innovation: “Core-Satellite†as a Response to Competing Logics Shaping Artisan Businesses," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    6. Bammens, Yannick & Hünermund, Paul, 2023. "Ecological community logics, identifiable business ownership, and green innovation as a company response," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    7. Tony Jaehyun Choi & Mike Valente, 2023. "The Crisis in Local Newspapers and Organizational Wrongdoing: The Role of Community Social Connectedness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1777-1799, September.
    8. Cheng, Guangyu & Zhang, Wenwen & Chau, Kwong Wing, 2025. "Can liberalizing rural construction land mitigate industrial land price distortion of China? An institutional logics perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Joyce C. Wang & Jingtao Yi & Xiuping Zhang & Mike W. Peng, 2022. "Pyramidal Ownership and SOE Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1839-1868, November.
    10. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Edgley, Carla & Robson, Keith & Sharma, Nina, 2022. "Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Zhang, Tingting & Kim, Incheol & Gracy Yang, Jingyu & Zhang, Zhengyi, 2025. "Which institutions impose more sanctions? Formal vs. informal CEO non-duality institutions and stock price crash risk of CEO duality firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Vasilii Erokhin & Dmitry Endovitsky & Alexey Bobryshev & Natalia Kulagina & Anna Ivolga, 2019. "Management Accounting Change as a Sustainable Economic Development Strategy during Pre-Recession and Recession Periods: Evidence from Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Runsen Yuan & Yan Li & Chunling Li & Xiaoran Sun & Lingyi Li, 2025. "The Impact of State-Owned Capital Participation on Carbon Emission Reduction in Private Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-39, August.
    14. David W. Lehman & Balázs Kovács & Glenn R. Carroll, 2014. "Conflicting Social Codes and Organizations: Hygiene and Authenticity in Consumer Evaluations of Restaurants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2602-2617, October.
    15. Zhang, Ruixue & Tang, Yuyan & Li, Yongli & Zhang, Yuanxin, 2025. "What motivates the collaborative innovation relationship in infrastructure projects from dynamic network perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Xu, Kefan & Yuan, Peng & Yu, Renjie, 2025. "The effects of mixed ownership reforms on Chinese firms’ emissions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 191-209.
    17. Syed Imran Saqib & Matthew MC Allen & Geoffrey Wood, 2022. "Lordly Management and its Discontents: ‘Human Resource Management’ in Pakistan," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 465-484, June.
    18. Irene Chu & Geoff Moore, 2020. "From Harmony to Conflict: MacIntyrean Virtue Ethics in a Confucian Tradition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 221-239, August.
    19. Na Yang & Jue Wang & Xiaming Liu & Lingyun Huang, 2022. "Home-country institutions and corporate social responsibility of emerging economy multinational enterprises: The belt and road initiative as an example," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 927-965, September.
    20. Xu, Kai & Hitt, Michael A. & Dai, Li, 2020. "International diversification of family-dominant firms: Integrating socioemotional wealth and behavioral theory of the firm," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:8:p:10059-10076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.