IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i7p9350-9378.html

Linking the Loop: A Social Network Theory Perspective on the Role of Circularity Brokers for the Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Stella Viscardi
  • Claudia Colicchia

Abstract

Circularity brokers are intermediaries fostering the exchange of circular flows and represent a critical yet underexplored aspect of circular economy. Through social network theory, this paper examines how circularity brokers support creating circular supply chains. Using qualitative meta‐analysis, the study examines 68 circular economy projects across sectors involving circularity brokers. The analysis enables investigating the actor playing the role of the circularity broker, its strategic orientation, and performed functions, along with the network structure and scope. Findings are summarized in nine propositions, highlighting how circularity brokers play a crucial role in fostering circularity, driven by their knowledge of circular economy and ability to offer tailor‐made services. Circularity brokers strategically orchestrate circular economy networks to either exploit circular flows and establish a business or develop connections among participating nodes, thereby fostering circular ecosystems. The clear identification of the role of circularity brokers can promote their diffusion, ultimately supporting circularity.

Suggested Citation

  • Stella Viscardi & Claudia Colicchia, 2025. "Linking the Loop: A Social Network Theory Perspective on the Role of Circularity Brokers for the Circular Economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 9350-9378, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:9350-9378
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70063
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik G. Hansen & Julia C. Schmitt, 2021. "Orchestrating cradle‐to‐cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 627-647, June.
    2. Virtanen, Yuan & Jiang, Yan & You, Weimu & Cai, Helen Huifen, 2023. "International intermediaries: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 932-949.
    3. Adrian Mulligan & Louise Hall & Ellen Raphael, 2013. "Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 132-161, January.
    4. Anne-Ryslène Zaoual & Xavier Lecocq, 2018. "Orchestrating Circularity within Industrial Ecosystems: Lessons from Iconic Cases in Three Different Countries," Post-Print hal-01745371, HAL.
    5. Kannan Govindan & Mia Hasanagic, 2018. "A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 278-311, January.
    6. Andreas Rauch & Robert van Doorn & Willem Hulsink, 2014. "A Qualitative Approach to Evidence–Based Entrepreneurship: Theoretical Considerations and an Example Involving Business Clusters," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(2), pages 333-368, March.
    7. Braz, Antonio Carlos & Marotti de Mello, Adriana, 2022. "Circular economy supply network management: A complex adaptive system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Adrian Mulligan & Louise Hall & Ellen Raphael, 2013. "Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 132-161, January.
    9. Ghinoi, Stefano & Silvestri, Francesco & Steiner, Bodo, 2020. "The role of local stakeholders in disseminating knowledge for supporting the circular economy: a network analysis approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Benito Mignacca & Serena Filippelli & Serena Strazzullo & Luigi Tiburzi & Andrea Urbinati & Julian Kirchherr, 2025. "Building circular economy theories: A practical‐oriented perspective and a way forward," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(2), pages 418-428, April.
    11. Zerbino, Pierluigi & Stefanini, Alessandro & Aloini, Davide & Dulmin, Riccardo & Mininno, Valeria, 2021. "Curling linearity into circularity: The benefits of formal scavenging in closed-loop settings," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Stadtler, Lea & Probst, Gilbert, 2012. "How broker organizations can facilitate public–private partnerships for development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 32-46.
    13. Francesca Ciulli & Ans Kolk & Siri Boe-Lillegraven, 2020. "Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 299-331, November.
    14. Stefanie Habersang & Jill Küberling‐Jost & Markus Reihlen & Christoph Seckler, 2019. "A Process Perspective on Organizational Failure: A Qualitative Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 19-56, January.
    15. Oliver Maaß & Philipp Grundmann, 2018. "Governing Transactions and Interdependences between Linked Value Chains in a Circular Economy: The Case of Wastewater Reuse in Braunschweig (Germany)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-29, April.
    16. Julian Kirchherr & Andrea Urbinati & Kris Hartley, 2023. "Circular economy: A new research field?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(5), pages 1239-1251, October.
    17. Annelise M. de Jong & Ann-Charlotte Mellquist, 2021. "The Potential of Plastic Reuse for Manufacturing: A Case Study into Circular Business Models for an On-Line Marketplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. James G. Combs & T. Russell Crook & Andreas Rauch, 2019. "Meta‐Analytic Research in Management: Contemporary Approaches, Unresolved Controversies, and Rising Standards," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitri Petrik & Simon Hiller & Dominik Morar, 2025. "Digital platforms for circular economy: Empirical development of a taxonomy and archetypes," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Value creation using minimal resources – A meta-synthesis of frugal innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Sarkar, Soumodip & Mateus, Sara, 2022. "Doing more with less - How frugal innovations can contribute to improving healthcare systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    4. Laubengaier, Désirée A. & Cagliano, Raffaella & Canterino, Filomena, 2022. "It Takes Two to Tango: Analyzing the Relationship between Technological and Administrative Process Innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    5. Noelia Garcia‐Buendia & Miguel Núñez‐Merino & José Moyano‐Fuentes & Juan Manuel Maqueira‐Marín, 2024. "Squaring circular supply chain management: A comprehensive overview of emerging themes and trends," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8190-8210, December.
    6. Shen, Lei & Shi, Qingyue & Parida, Vinit & Jovanovic, Marin, 2024. "Ecosystem orchestration practices for industrial firms: A qualitative meta-analysis, framework development and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. J. A. Garcia & Rosa Rodriguez-Sánchez & J. Fdez-Valdivia, 2021. "The interplay between the reviewer’s incentives and the journal’s quality standard," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3041-3061, April.
    8. Zhu, He & Hu, Jiayao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Towards a circular supply chain for retired electric vehicle batteries: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    9. Agarwal, Reeti & Mehrotra, Ankit & Alofaysan, Hind & Mahto, Raj V., 2025. "Digital technologies and green infrastructure: Advancing a resilient circular supply chain," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Bianchi, Federico & Grimaldo, Francisco & Squazzoni, Flaminio, 2019. "The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 78-86.
    11. Yuetong Chen & Hao Wang & Baolong Zhang & Wei Zhang, 2022. "A method of measuring the article discriminative capacity and its distribution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3317-3341, June.
    12. Michail Kovanis & Ludovic Trinquart & Philippe Ravaud & Raphaël Porcher, 2017. "Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 651-671, October.
    13. Qianjin Zong & Yafen Xie & Jiechun Liang, 2020. "Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 607-623, October.
    14. Maciej J Mrowinski & Piotr Fronczak & Agata Fronczak & Marcel Ausloos & Olgica Nedic, 2017. "Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, September.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0147913 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. ShivamKrishn Agrawal & Vijay Kumar Jain & Shipra Agarwal, 2025. "Circular Bioeconomy: a Comprehensive Approach to Planetary Health and Sustainability," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1483-1508, April.
    17. Narjes Vara & Mahdieh Mirzabeigi & Hajar Sotudeh & Seyed Mostafa Fakhrahmad, 2022. "Application of k-means clustering algorithm to improve effectiveness of the results recommended by journal recommender system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3237-3252, June.
    18. Mariachiara Colucci & Daria Demyanova, 2025. "Illuminating the Field of Sustainable Ecosystems: Framing the Evolution and Future Through Bibliometric and Theme Analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 10474-10494, December.
    19. Katarina Krapež, 2022. "Advancing Self-Evaluative and Self-Regulatory Mechanisms of Scholarly Journals: Editors’ Perspectives on What Needs to Be Improved in the Editorial Process," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Daniel A. Salas & Paulina Criollo & Angel D. Ramirez, 2021. "The Role of Higher Education Institutions in the Implementation of Circular Economy in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-27, August.
    21. Jens Peter Andersen & Serge P. J. M. Horbach & Tony Ross-Hellauer, 2024. "Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5673-5687, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:7:p:9350-9378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.