IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i6p7897-7924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Artificial Intelligence and Circular Economy Activities ‘Run‐of‐the‐Mill’ in Integrated Reporting?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarfraz Nazir
  • Federica Doni
  • Alessandro Capocchi
  • Amna Sarfraz

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the nexus of artificial intelligence (AI) and circular economy (CE) activities in integrated reporting (IR) practices. The study used data on the top 100 most sustainable corporations provided by Corporate Knights, which analyses roughly 7000 public firms with annual revenue of at least US$ $1 billion and the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI). Our research methodology consists of content and regression analysis. Research uncovered that both AI and CE initiatives aimed at reducing, recycling, remanufacturing and redesigning have connections to waste. Remanufacturing activities are linked to energy intensity, while all CE and AI variables, except for reuse, are associated with water usage. Additionally, we found that the company's revenue is linked to CE and AI efforts involving reduction, reuse, redesign and remanufacturing. The originality of this study is to provide a primary conceptual framework to disclose relevant AI and CE activities through IR by improving sustainable development. Our findings highlight the need for policymakers to develop or integrate standards that incorporate financial, social, environmental and AI aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarfraz Nazir & Federica Doni & Alessandro Capocchi & Amna Sarfraz, 2025. "Are Artificial Intelligence and Circular Economy Activities ‘Run‐of‐the‐Mill’ in Integrated Reporting?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7897-7924, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7897-7924
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4351
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7897-7924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.