IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i6p7656-7673.html

How Companies With Industrial Symbiosis Business Models Can Contribute to the Mainstreaming of Industrial Symbiosis

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Nyström
  • Murat Mirata

Abstract

Companies incorporating industrial symbiosis in their business models (ISBMs) play important roles in the realization of IS solutions. This paper explores how this group can also influence contextual conditions for the wider adoption of these solutions, thus contributing to their mainstreaming. Through a multiple case study of development processes connected to a diverse set of ISBM companies, three types of mechanisms were abductively synthesized: business model innovation, contribution to emergent societal change, and institutional entrepreneuring. These suggest that ISBM companies as a group, under the right conditions, play an important role in mainstreaming IS within companies, across industrial systems, and at the societal level. Our study found evidence of early steps in these directions. The paper contributes to the limited empirical foundation on companies with an ISBM and proposes new mainstreaming mechanisms for IS linked to the emergence of actors with IS as a core concern rather than a side activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Nyström & Murat Mirata, 2025. "How Companies With Industrial Symbiosis Business Models Can Contribute to the Mainstreaming of Industrial Symbiosis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7656-7673, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7656-7673
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4363
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Owais Khan & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1479-1493, March.
    2. Liudmila Kokoulina & Liubov Ermolaeva & Samuli Patala & Paavo Ritala, 2019. "Championing processes and the emergence of industrial symbiosis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 528-539, April.
    3. Alfred Posch & Abhishek Agarwal & Peter Strachan, 2011. "Editorial: Managing Industrial Symbiosis (IS) Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 421-427, November.
    4. Nicolas Bijon & Juliette Cerceau & Magali Dechesne & Guillaume Junqua & Tom Wassenaar, 2022. "What and why? Exploring rational myths of industrial symbioses in French case studies," Post-Print hal-03712860, HAL.
    5. V. Warnier & X. Weppe & X. Lecocq, 2013. "Extending resource-based theory : considering strategic, ordinary and junk resources," Post-Print hal-00843373, HAL.
    6. Pettigrew, Andrew M., 1997. "What is a processual analysis?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 337-348, December.
    7. Julie Battilana & Bernard Leca & Eva Boxenbaum, 2009. "How actors change institutions : Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-00576509, HAL.
    8. Bolton, Ronan & Hannon, Matthew, 2016. "Governing sustainability transitions through business model innovation: Towards a systems understanding," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1731-1742.
    9. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Rui Castro & João Azevedo, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis: A Sectoral Analysis on Enablers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Stefan Schaltegger & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Erik G. Hansen, 2012. "Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 95-119.
    11. Anne P.M. Velenturf & Paul D. Jensen, 2016. "Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(4), pages 700-709, August.
    12. Antonella Zucchella & Pietro Previtali, 2019. "Circular business models for sustainable development: A “waste is food” restorative ecosystem," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 274-285, February.
    13. Matthew P. Johnson & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: A Review and Multilevel Causal Mechanism Framework," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1141-1173, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristina Nyström & Murat Mirata, 2025. "Regenerative businesses' role in industrial symbiosis realisation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2392-2405, April.
    2. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    3. Aikaterini Argyrou & Nicolas Chevrollier & Andre Nijhof, 2023. "The versatile role of sustainable market entrepreneurs in market transformation: An intervention framework for institutional change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 259-273, January.
    4. Tina Sendlhofer & Arno Kourula, 2025. "“Sustainability Comes First”: An Institutional Entrepreneur Enacting Its Principles to Challenge a Dominant Norm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 9743-9760, December.
    5. Stefan Schaltegger & Derk Loorbach & Jacob Hörisch, 2023. "Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 891-902, February.
    6. Suyash Jolly & Rob Raven, 2013. "Collective institutional entrepreneurship and contestations in wind energy in India," Working Papers 13-10, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Nov 2013.
    7. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    8. Marcos Ferasso & Tatiana Beliaeva & Sascha Kraus & Thomas Clauss & Domingo Ribeiro‐Soriano, 2020. "Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3006-3024, December.
    9. Francesco Cafforio & Stefano Franco & Ilaria Giannoccaro, 2025. "Bridging Micro and Macro Perspectives in Circular Business Model Studies: An Integrated Literature Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7085-7111, September.
    10. Corentin Juin & Valentine Georget & Thierry Rayna, 2025. "Business Model Innovation: a Framework for Assessing Corporate Engagement with Sustainability," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(7), pages 6411-6433, December.
    11. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    12. S. Schaltegger & V. Girschik & H. Trittin‐Ulbrich & I. Weissbrod & T. Daudigeos, 2024. "Corporate change agents for sustainability: Transforming organizations from the inside out," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 145-156, April.
    13. Erik G. Hansen & Julia C. Schmitt, 2021. "Orchestrating cradle‐to‐cradle innovation across the value chain: Overcoming barriers through innovation communities, collaboration mechanisms, and intermediation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 627-647, June.
    14. Hiteva, Ralitsa & Foxon, Timothy J., 2021. "Beware the value gap: Creating value for users and for the system through innovation in digital energy services business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Felix Carl Schultz & Vladislav Valentinov & Ingo Pies, 2025. "The stakeholder business case for circular economy: An ordonomic approach for developing a circular economy business case by stakeholder governance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(4), pages 1279-1292, August.
    16. Sonia Herrero-Luna & Marta Ferrer-Serrano & María Pilar Latorre-Martínez, 2022. "Circular Economy and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 65-84.
    17. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund, 2020. "Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 665-681, February.
    18. Raffaella Taddeo & Alberto Simboli & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Anna Morgante, 2017. "Industrial Symbiosis, Networking and Innovation: The Potential Role of Innovation Poles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Joseph Kimaro & Virginie Litaudon & Danni Zhang & Regina Frei, 2026. "Circular Business Models in Retail and Manufacturing: Mechanisms, Drivers, and Barriers," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 1-41, April.
    20. Ignė Stalmokaitė & Tommy Larsson Segerlind & Johanna Yliskylä‐Peuralahti, 2023. "Revival of wind‐powered shipping: Comparing the early‐stage innovation process of an incumbent and a newcomer firm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 958-975, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7656-7673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.