Author
Listed:
- Jian Wang
- Abednego Osei
- Andrew Osei Agyemang
Abstract
This study contributes to the literature on sustainability, innovation, and productivity by examining the relationship between green innovation (GI) and firm‐level Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP) in the United States and China. Drawing on resource‐based theory, dynamic capabilities, innovation theory, and cost–benefit analysis, the study investigates the roles of GI, eco‐technology intensity (EcoT), and absorption capacity in shaping GTFP. The sample includes 579 listed manufacturing firms from China and 612 from the United States between 2000 and 2022. To address potential endogeneity, dynamic generalized method of moment (GMM) estimator is employed, along with instrumental variables. The findings show that green utility patents positively impact GTFP in the United States whereas green design patents have a greater effect in China. Nonlinear results indicate that the impact of GI on GTFP increases at an accelerating rate with higher patent numbers, with stronger effects in the United States for utility patents and in China for design patents. Absorptive capacity plays a key role in mediating this relationship, with Chinese firms benefiting more from green design patents and US firms from green utility patents. EcoT moderates the relationship, with a more pronounced effect in the United States due to its advanced technological infrastructure. The study also reveals significant heterogeneity across industries and ownership types, and the results remain robust after several tests. Policy recommendations include promoting green utility patents in the United States, scaling green design patents in China, and strengthening absorption capacities. Tailored policies for different industries and ownership types are crucial to maximizing GTFP and promoting sustainable green innovation.
Suggested Citation
Jian Wang & Abednego Osei & Andrew Osei Agyemang, 2025.
"Leveraging Green Innovation and Eco‐Technology for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Firm‐Level Productivity Analysis in China and the United States,"
Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7389-7411, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7389-7411
DOI: 10.1002/bse.4360
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7389-7411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.