IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i6p7139-7160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the ESG Credibility Gap: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating ESG Decoupling

Author

Listed:
  • Catarina Cepêda
  • Albertina Paula Monteiro
  • Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán

Abstract

Because of their capacity for sustained and informed monitoring, institutional investors are uniquely positioned to enhance corporate transparency and mitigate ESG decoupling, the gap between corporate sustainability rhetoric and reality. This study examines whether and under what circumstances institutional ownership contributes to aligning ESG disclosure with actual sustainability performance. Analysing an international sample of 3465 listed companies (13,488 firm‐year observations) from 2009 to 2023, we find that institutional investors play a crucial role in reducing ESG decoupling. However, this effect depends on their investment horizon: long‐term institutional investors mitigate ESG decoupling, whereas short‐term institutional investors exacerbate it. These findings contribute to the corporate governance and sustainability literature by showing that institutional investors are not a homogeneous group and that their monitoring effectiveness varies depending on their investment horizon. From a practical perspective, our results highlight the need for regulatory initiatives that incentivise long‐term institutional engagement and more stringent ESG reporting requirements to curb opportunistic disclosure practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Catarina Cepêda & Albertina Paula Monteiro & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2025. "Bridging the ESG Credibility Gap: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating ESG Decoupling," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 7139-7160, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7139-7160
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:7139-7160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.