IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i6p6594-6611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable but Not Accountable? A Quality Assessment of Sustainability Disclosure in Benefit Corporations

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Riso
  • Silvia Cantele
  • Enrico Bracci

Abstract

Benefit corporations are businesses characterised by a dual purpose: profit and the common good. While these businesses are expected to pursue a high level of transparency, some studies have noted ambiguous and inconsistent behaviour in the quality of their reports and communication with stakeholders. The literature proposed reporting quality indexes and identified explanatory factors, although specific research on disclosure quality among benefit corporations is lacking. This study aimed to fill this gap by proposing a methodology to assess the quality of sustainability disclosure in benefit corporations. Drawing from a sample of their sustainability reporting in Italy, the study applies qualitative content analysis to create the disclosure quality index and uses a regression model to test potential antecedents. The findings indicate a generally low level of disclosure quality and limited impact of third‐party certification and control mechanisms. These results raise questions on the accountability of benefit corporations and the limitations of their mandatory reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Riso & Silvia Cantele & Enrico Bracci, 2025. "Sustainable but Not Accountable? A Quality Assessment of Sustainability Disclosure in Benefit Corporations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 6594-6611, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:6594-6611
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4311
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:6:p:6594-6611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.