IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i5p6345-6362.html

The Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure: Evidence From Social Media Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Nicolo
  • Lukasz Bryl
  • Diana Ferullo

Abstract

This study intends to bridge an important research gap in the existing literature by extending academic knowledge on the relationship between national cultural dimensions and corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure practices via social media. To this end, this study relies upon a sample of 96 of the world's largest companies from the Fortune Global 500 list over the 2018–2020 period. A dictionary‐based content analysis was conducted on a total of 122,739 tweets extracted from the official Twitter accounts of sampled companies to identify and codify those containing ESG themes according to a glossary created on the basis of the Bloomberg ESG Index. Accordingly, several panel regression models were estimated to examine the influence of national culture represented by the six Hofstede's cultural dimensions, namely, power distance (PD), individualism (IDV), masculinity (MAS), uncertainty avoidance (UA), long‐term orientation (LTO) and indulgence (IND), and the level of ESG disclosure provided by sampled companies via Twitter. The study's findings reveal that companies operating in countries with less power distance are more likely to disclose ESG information via Twitter. Also, companies from countries with individualist and masculine cultures tend to provide more ESG disclosure via Twitter.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Nicolo & Lukasz Bryl & Diana Ferullo, 2025. "The Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure: Evidence From Social Media Practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 6345-6362, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:6345-6362
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4304
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hichem Khlif, 2016. "Hofstede’s cultural dimensions in accounting research: a review," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 545-573, October.
    2. Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Francesco Albergo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Social media to disseminate circular economy information. An empirical analysis on Twitter," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 528-539, January.
    3. Nerantzidis, Michail & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & She, Chaoyuan, 2024. "Social media in accounting research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. She, Chaoyuan & Michelon, Giovanna, 2019. "Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 54-76.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2015-2122 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Giuseppe Nicolo' & José María Cervilla‐Bellido, 2025. "Investigating the antecedents of Sustainable Development Goals disclosure via social media: Evidence from water companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 2317-2331, March.
    7. Hervé Stolowy & Luc Paugam, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting: Is Convergence Possible?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 139-165, May.
    8. Giacomo Manetti & Marco Bellucci, 2016. "The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 985-1011, August.
    9. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    10. Igor Álvarez Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas & Stefan Schaltegger & Stefan Schaltegger & Igor Álvarez Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas, 2017. "Innovating Corporate Accounting and Reporting for Sustainability – Attributes and Challenges," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 113-122, March.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-02-2020-4445 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Walid Ben‐Amar & Mohamed Chelli, 2018. "What drives voluntary corporate water disclosures? The effect of country‐level institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1609-1622, December.
    13. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2014-1797 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. René Orij, 2010. "Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 868-889, September.
    15. Pablo Gómez-Carrasco & Encarna Guillamón-Saorín & Beatriz García Osma, 2021. "Stakeholders versus Firm Communication in Social Media: The Case of Twitter and Corporate Social Responsibility Information," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 31-62, January.
    16. Marco Bellucci & Giacomo Manetti, 2017. "Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 874-905, May.
    17. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    18. Sumit Lodhia & Amanpreet Kaur & Gerard Stone, 2020. "The use of social media as a legitimation tool for sustainability reporting," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(4), pages 613-632, April.
    19. Silvia Panfilo & Joanna Krasodomska, 2022. "Climate Change Risk Disclosure in Europe: The Role of Cultural-Cognitive, Regulative, and Normative Factors," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 226-253, January.
    20. Gregory D. Saxton & Charlotte Ren & Chao Guo, 2021. "Responding to Diffused Stakeholders on Social Media: Connective Power and Firm Reactions to CSR-Related Twitter Messages," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 229-252, August.
    21. Giacomo Manetti & Marco Bellucci, 2016. "The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(6), pages 985-1011, August.
    22. Brendan O'Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman, 2020. "Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 1113-1141, June.
    23. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571011080162 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. van der Laan Smith, Joyce & Adhikari, Ajay & Tondkar, Rasoul H., 2005. "Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 123-151.
    25. René Orij, 2010. "Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 868-889, September.
    26. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2008. "Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 685-701, December.
    27. Michela Arnaboldi & Cristiano Busco & Suresh Cuganesan, 2017. "Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 762-776, May.
    28. Gallego-Álvarez, Prof. Isabel & Ortas, Prof. Eduardo, 2017. "Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 337-353.
    29. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2017-2880 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alice Pennesi & Marco Giuliani, 2025. "Social Media and Sustainability Reporting: A Literature Review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7314-7335, October.
    2. Giuseppe Nicolò & Gianluca Zanellato & Benedetta Esposito & Adriana Tiron‐Tudor, 2024. "Cultural dimensions and sustainability disclosure in the banking sector: Insights from a qualitative comparative analysis approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8086-8101, December.
    3. Noha Abdelrahman & Jonida Carungu & Shahbano Khan, 2026. "The Relationship Between Sustainable Performance and Economic Value: An Evaluation of the Economic Implications of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 939-950, March.
    4. Benedetta Valeria Cannizzaro & Rodolfo Damiano & Marcantonio Ruisi, 2026. "Talking out loud on sustainable development goals (SDGs): what is the role of sustainability performance and national culture within CEO-speak?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 30(1), pages 305-335, March.
    5. Nerantzidis, Michail & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & She, Chaoyuan, 2024. "Social media in accounting research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Luigi Lepore & Loris Landriani & Sabrina Pisano & Gabriella D’Amore & Stefano Pozzoli, 2023. "Corporate governance in the digital age: the role of social media and board independence in CSR disclosure. Evidence from Italian listed companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 749-785, September.
    7. Antonio Somoza, 2023. "Voluntary sustainability assurance in small and medium‐sized entities: The role of country origin in Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 462-483, January.
    8. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.
    9. Jiaxin Liu & Boram Lee & Ruth Rentschler, 2025. "Leveraging entrepreneurial identity and technology: legitimacy of art securitization platforms," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 49(2), pages 327-354, June.
    10. Goncharenko, Galina, 2023. "In the spotlight: Rethinking NGO accountability in the #MeToo era," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. She, Chaoyuan & Michelon, Giovanna, 2019. "Managing stakeholder perceptions: Organized hypocrisy in CSR disclosures on Facebook," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 54-76.
    12. Liaqat, Idrees & Floreani, Josanco & Naseer, Mirza Muhammad, 2026. "ESG performance and Bank stability: The role of national culture and formal institutions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Hüseyin Temiz & Merve Acar, 2023. "Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in different disclosure environments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2247-2264, September.
    14. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    15. Alharthi, Amal & Cortese, Corinne & Moerman, Lee & Tanima, Farzana, 2022. "Surveillance capitalism in the middle east retail sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Knudsen, Dan-Richard, 2020. "Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    17. Simone Pizzi & Sara Moggi & Fabio Caputo & Pierfelice Rosato, 2021. "Social media as stakeholder engagement tool: CSR communication failure in the oil and gas sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 849-859, March.
    18. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang, 2022. "National culture and corporate carbon performance," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(3), pages 503-538, August.
    19. Seyla Rizky Amelia & Miranti Kartika Dewi, 2021. "How a nonprofit organization delivers online accountability through social media," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(3), pages 317-334, September.
    20. Giuseppe Nicolo & Giovanni Zampone & Giuseppe Sannino & Paolo Tartaglia Polcini, 2025. "Ready for Change After the Omnibus Package? Early Compliance With the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and Its Key Determinants in the New Regulatory Era," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 9040-9058, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:6345-6362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.