IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i5p6325-6344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silos and Sustainability: How the Permeability of Organizational Boundaries Shapes Corporate Sustainability Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen
  • Luigi Tiburzi
  • Francesco Rosati
  • Roberta Costa
  • Armando Calabrese

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine how the permeability of organizational boundaries shapes corporate sustainability (CS) integration. The literature suggests that CS should be integrated throughout the organization and in its relationships with key, external stakeholders, but limited knowledge exists on the relationship between CS integration and the characteristics of the multiple, co‐existing boundaries which define the organization (hierarchies, functions, professions, etc.). Based on a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) analysis of survey responses from over 7000 organization members in three Nordic countries (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden), this study demonstrates that the permeability of organizational boundaries increases the level of CS integration and reduces the level of organizational tensions. Moreover, the findings show that boundary permeability becomes increasingly important for understanding CS integration as the size of the organization increases. The findings deepen our knowledge of organizational boundaries and show how these “sites of difference” influence the level of CS integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Luigi Tiburzi & Francesco Rosati & Roberta Costa & Armando Calabrese, 2025. "Silos and Sustainability: How the Permeability of Organizational Boundaries Shapes Corporate Sustainability Integration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 6325-6344, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:6325-6344
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:6325-6344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.