IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i5p5435-5458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraining or Enabling Green Management and Technological Innovation: How Do Firms Respond to Climate Policy Uncertainty?

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiyang Niu
  • Peter Teirlinck
  • Guanghua Xie
  • Yajie Yang

Abstract

This research delves into firms' green innovation response to climate policy uncertainty (CPU). We distinguish green management innovation from green technological innovation and investigate the moderating effect of belonging to a high‐energy‐consuming industry and investors' climate attention. Based on Chinese A‐share listed firms in 2008–2022, we reveal a positive influence of CPU on green management innovation but a more limited effect on green technological innovation. However, firms' green technological innovation response is found to be more positive in the high‐energy‐consuming industry, and increased climate attention by investors strengthens CPU's facilitating effect on both green management and green technological innovation. In terms of longer‐term outcomes, we reveal that firms' participation in green technological innovation prompted by CPU significantly bolsters firms' competitive advantage. Our research offers novel insights into the inconsistent debate relationship between CPU and green innovation and influencing contextual factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiyang Niu & Peter Teirlinck & Guanghua Xie & Yajie Yang, 2025. "Constraining or Enabling Green Management and Technological Innovation: How Do Firms Respond to Climate Policy Uncertainty?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 5435-5458, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:5435-5458
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:5:p:5435-5458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.