IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i4p4695-4716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a Paradoxical Frame Encourage Green Behavior in Consumers?

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Testa
  • Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti
  • Vinicio Di Iorio
  • Marco Frey

Abstract

Green consumption presents a unique challenge: While it advocates for environmental protection through purchasing choices and consumption habits, it can also create a psychological tension by merging two long‐standing sociocultural opposites, namely, consumption and environmental stewardship. Leveraging the paradox theory, we investigate whether the ability to navigate such a tension predicts green consumption. Our framework underwent testing in two studies. Study 1 scrutinizes Italian respondents (n = 1029), while Study 2 replicates the framework on a larger scale across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Poland (n = 5124), focusing on clothing. Both studies reveal that consumers capable of grappling with such a tension are more likely to engage in green consumption, including sharing and purchasing second‐hand, responsible use and disposal, and repairing. By introducing a new cognitive frame for green consumption that accommodates the plurality of goals and quantifying its impact, this research unveils the power of embracing tensions in consumption for the benefit of the planet.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Testa & Natalia Marzia Gusmerotti & Vinicio Di Iorio & Marco Frey, 2025. "Does a Paradoxical Frame Encourage Green Behavior in Consumers?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4695-4716, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4695-4716
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4226
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4695-4716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.