Author
Listed:
- Daniel González Cortés
- Suman Lodh
- Saeed Akbar
- Monomita Nandy
Abstract
This research examines how climate claims by companies from the United Kingdom have changed over the years, especially when they became certain about the mandate of the Taskforce on Climate‐related Financial Disclosure (TCFD). We use text data from FTSE 100 companies for eight consecutive years, starting from 2016, and apply the robust ClimateBERT algorithm to analyse company statements related to climate claims, where they claim how they take care of climate in their business operations. Our findings show that the total number of corporate climate claims made has substantially increased since 2016, resulting in an overall improvement in corporate environmental claims till 2023. This coincides with the official announcement of the TCFD mandate.Our analyses also indicate that the proportion of claims in each report has increased over the years despite economic uncertainties. Additionally, the study findings reveal that even industries with minimal or negligible climate claims can still be associated with carbon‐intensive activities. The complementary features of the legitimacy and stakeholder theories support our findings. By applying ClimateBERT, our research mitigates existing data challenges, yielding an efficient framework for analysing text through a robust natural language processing model. Our findings will assist policymakers in identifying necessary modifications to corporate climate disclosure and will help assess the impact of the Taskforce intervention on climate‐related financial disclosure.
Suggested Citation
Daniel González Cortés & Suman Lodh & Saeed Akbar & Monomita Nandy, 2025.
"Disclosure Dynamism: TCFD Aligned Climate Claims of UK Corporates,"
Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4191-4205, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4191-4205
DOI: 10.1002/bse.4189
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:4191-4205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.