IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p3865-3891.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco‐Innovation, Corporate Governance and Nation‐Level Institutions: A Cross‐Country Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Arup Roy
  • Ranjan DasGupta

Abstract

There is a dearth of empirical research to examine how a firm's internal corporate governance mechanisms would impact eco‐innovation practices under distinctive nation‐level institutions. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the individual roles of board size, board diversity (i.e., female directors' presence) and board independence in motivating a firm's eco‐innovation practices in an extended cross‐country setting. Furthermore, we examine whether nation‐level institutions moderate our primary study associations. By employing the system generalized method of moment (SGMM) method for panel data of 19 countries from 2010 to 2021, we find a positive impact of board diversity and independence, whereas board size has a significant negative influence on a firm's eco‐innovation practices. However, the political and cultural systems moderate negatively, whereas the education and labour systems and financial systems strengthen our primary findings. The results remain strong even after using additional measurements for dependent variables, addressing endogeneity concerns and using multiple estimating methods to account for bias from omitted variables. Regulators and policymakers can use these findings to formulate stringent institutional policies in regard to nation‐level eco‐innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Arup Roy & Ranjan DasGupta, 2025. "Eco‐Innovation, Corporate Governance and Nation‐Level Institutions: A Cross‐Country Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3865-3891, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3865-3891
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3865-3891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.