IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p3827-3847.html

Navigating the Future: Examining Sustainable and Resilient Drivers Shaping the Integration of Crowdshipping in E‐Commerce Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Sawyasachi Awasthi
  • Priyanka Verma
  • Balkrishna E. Narkhede

Abstract

The last mile is often subjected to unique challenges such as congested urban areas, unpredictable customer availability and the need for personalized services. To address these complexities, and to be competitive in the market, companies are increasingly turning towards innovative solutions. One such innovative solution is crowdshipping (CS). The concept of CS was first introduced by Walmart in 2013, where store customers may act as crowdshippers and fulfill the demands of online retailers or shops by transporting packages on their way home with guaranteed compensation. To understand the factors influencing CS and its potential to motivate logistics firms for delivery, this research work determines the 20 key sustainable and resilient factors affecting the adoption of CS in the e‐commerce logistics sector. Furthermore, the Neutrosophic Best‐Worst Method (NBWM) is employed to prioritize these factors, followed by the application of Neutrosophic Interpretive Structural Modeling (NISM) with cross‐impact matrix multiplication applied to classification (MICMAC) analysis to assess the interrelationships amongst the factors. The results of the NBWM reveal that technology for the successful implementation of CS, rating and reward system, delivery cost–time efficiency, CO2 emissions and service quality are the top five highly weighted factors. The results of NISM dictate the technology for the successful implementation of CS, integration of CS with the mainstream (operations research models), government interventions and the usage of back‐up drivers as the factors with the highest driving power. The proposed NBWM and NISM give direction to practitioners and policy managers in planning sustainable and resilient strategies for addressing CS implementation factors in the e‐commerce logistics sector. Further, competent strategies can be developed by the managers based on the prioritization and the driving and dependence power of CS adoption factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sawyasachi Awasthi & Priyanka Verma & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2025. "Navigating the Future: Examining Sustainable and Resilient Drivers Shaping the Integration of Crowdshipping in E‐Commerce Logistics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3827-3847, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3827-3847
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4176
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Fuqi & Brunelli, Matteo & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Valentina Carbone & Aurélien Rouquet & Christine Roussat, 2017. "The Rise of Crowd Logistics: A New Way to Co‐Create Logistics Value," Post-Print hal-03118967, HAL.
    4. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    5. Sricharan Chirra & Dinesh Kumar, 2018. "Analysis of SCF under sales promotional schemes: an application of interpretive structural modelling approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(18), pages 6015-6033, September.
    6. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2022. "Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 539-556.
    7. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Yuwei Yan & Xiaomeng Ma & Yi Song & Ajay Kumar & Ruixian Yang, 2023. "Exploring the interaction and choice behavior of organization and individuals in the crowd logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 1021-1040, January.
    9. Vishwas Dohale & Priya Ambilkar & Angappa Gunasekaran & Vijay Bilolikar, 2024. "Examining the barriers to operationalization of humanitarian supply chains: lessons learned from COVID-19 crisis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1137-1176, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Archetti, C. & Coelho, L.C. & Speranza, M.G. & Vansteenwegen, P., 2026. "Beyond fifty years of vehicle routing: Insights into the history and the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 330(2), pages 355-372.
    2. Simona Mancini & Margaretha Gansterer, 2024. "Bundle generation for the vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers and time windows," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1189-1221, December.
    3. Cebeci, Merve Seher & de Bok, Michiel & Tapia, Rodrigo & Nadi, Ali & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2025. "Feasibility of crowdshipping for outlier parcels in last-mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Jiang, Dapei & Li, Xiangyong & Yang, Wei & Zhao, Yuxuan, 2026. "An integrated optimization approach for e-order fulfillment using self-owned and crowdsourced delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Mousavi, Kianoush & Bodur, Merve & Cevik, Mucahit & Roorda, Matthew J., 2024. "Approximate dynamic programming for pickup and delivery problem with crowd-shipping," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Bhatt, Sahil, 2026. "Fleet size planning in crowdsourced delivery: Balancing service level and driver utilization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Annarita De Maio & Jeffrey W. Ohlmann & Sara Stoia & Francesca Vocaturo, 2025. "Analysis of in-store crowdshipping in a stochastic dynamic pickup-and-delivery system," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 33(3), pages 1149-1170, September.
    11. Mancini, Simona & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2025. "Dynamic assignment of delivery order bundles to in-store customers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Arslan, Alp & Kılcı, Fırat & Cheng, Shih-Fen & Misra, Archan, 2026. "Choice-based crowdshipping for next-day delivery services: A dynamic task display problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 336-348.
    13. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "Bundle generation for last-mile delivery with occasional drivers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Garcia-Herrera, Alisson & Serrano-Hernandez, Adrian & Faulin, Javier, 2025. "Understanding the dynamics of crowdshipping in last-mile distribution within urban mobility: A comprehensive framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Chun Cheng & Melvyn Sim & Yue Zhao, 2025. "Robust Workforce Management with Crowdsourced Delivery," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(2), pages 595-612, March.
    16. Lin Zhou & Yanping Chen & Yi Jing & Youwei Jiang, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration—Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Zhang, Jian & Woensel, Tom Van, 2023. "Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    19. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Ausseil, Rosemonde & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2024. "Online acceptance probability approximation in peer-to-peer transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3827-3847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.