IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p3739-3763.html

Readiness for Mandatory Climate‐Related Disclosures: A Tri‐Jurisdictional Analysis of Governance Attributes in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Olayinka Moses
  • Binh Bui
  • Muhammad Nurul Houqe
  • Zahra Borghei

Abstract

We evaluate the preparedness of companies in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to comply with emerging mandatory climate‐related disclosures (CRDs) aligned with TCFD recommendations, using their Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) information. Our analysis also examines the corporate governance attributes influencing their readiness to disclose such information. The findings reveal a strong integration of the Governance aspect of TCFD‐recommended disclosure, with an 86% alignment between CDP and TCFD disclosures in the Governance theme. However, lower alignment is observed for Strategy (50%) and Metrics and Targets (49%), highlighting the need for immediate improvements in these areas. Firms with more gender‐diverse boards and the presence of a sustainability committee demonstrate greater readiness to comply with CRDs consistent with TCFD recommendations. These insights shed light on firms' readiness for emerging mandatory CRD across jurisdictions, especially considering the new IFRS sustainability standards. The results underscore the urgent need to enhance competencies in Strategy and Metrics and Targets, where alignment is weakest. Practically, by documenting these insights, we provide managers with early guidance on the implications of their current CRD practices. This is especially relevant for firms subject to, or soon to be impacted by, mandatory sustainability regulations in their jurisdictions. The findings hold paramount significance for managers, policymakers and regulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Olayinka Moses & Binh Bui & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Zahra Borghei, 2025. "Readiness for Mandatory Climate‐Related Disclosures: A Tri‐Jurisdictional Analysis of Governance Attributes in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 3739-3763, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3739-3763
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4154
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lies Bouten & Patricia Everaert & Luc Van Liedekerke & Lieven De Moor & Johan Christiaens, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 187-204, September.
    2. Bastien David & Sophie Giordano-Spring, 2022. "Climate Reporting Related to the TCFD Framework: An Exploration of the Air Transport Sector," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1-2), pages 18-37, May.
    3. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 2002. "Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 1147-1170, June.
    4. Bui, Binh & de Villiers, Charl, 2017. "Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 4-24.
    5. Nurlan Orazalin & Monowar Mahmood, 2021. "Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3569-3588, December.
    6. Christine Mallin & Giovanna Michelon & Davide Raggi, 2013. "Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders’ Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 29-43, April.
    7. Tobias Gerwing & Peter Kajüter & Maximilian Wirth, 2022. "The role of sustainable corporate governance in mandatory sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 517-555, April.
    8. Zeeshan Mahmood & Rehana Kouser & Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, 2019. "An emerging economy perspective on corporate sustainability reporting – main actors’ views on the current state of affairs in Pakistan," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-31, December.
    9. Jasmin Joecks & Kerstin Pull & Karin Vetter, 2013. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 61-72, November.
    10. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2020. "Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 74-94, January.
    11. Samira Demaria & Sandra Rigot, 2021. "Corporate environmental reporting: Are French firms compliant with the Task Force on Climate Financial Disclosures' recommendations?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 721-738, January.
    12. Moses, Olayinka & Houqe, Muhammad Nurul & van Zijl, Tony, 2018. "What is the economic value of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) information disclosure?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 216-233.
    13. Al-Tuwaijri, Sulaiman A. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Hughes, K. II, 2004. "The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(5-6), pages 447-471.
    14. Gary Peters & Andrea Romi, 2014. "Does the Voluntary Adoption of Corporate Governance Mechanisms Improve Environmental Risk Disclosures? Evidence from Greenhouse Gas Emission Accounting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 637-666, December.
    15. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    16. Walid Ben-Amar & Millicent Chang & Philip McIlkenny, 2017. "Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Response to Sustainability Initiatives: Evidence from the Carbon Disclosure Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 369-383, May.
    17. Haque, Faizul, 2017. "The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 347-364.
    18. Wai Fong Chua & Ramana James & Adrian King & Eric Lee & Naomi Soderstrom, 2022. "Task Force on Climate‐related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Implementation: An Overview and Insights from the Australian Accounting Standards Board Dialogue Series," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 396-405, September.
    19. La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 2000. "Investor protection and corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 3-27.
    20. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    21. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2022. "Cheap talk and cherry-picking: What ClimateBert has to say on corporate climate risk disclosures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    22. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    23. Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Habib Zaman Khan & Olayinka Moses & Arun Elias, 2024. "Corporate reputation, cost of capital and the moderating role of economic development: international evidence," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 1106-1134, January.
    24. Nooraisah Katmon & Zam Zuriyati Mohamad & Norlia Mat Norwani & Omar Al Farooque, 2019. "Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 447-481, June.
    25. Joeri Rogelj & Alexander Popp & Katherine V. Calvin & Gunnar Luderer & Johannes Emmerling & David Gernaat & Shinichiro Fujimori & Jessica Strefler & Tomoko Hasegawa & Giacomo Marangoni & Volker Krey &, 2018. "Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(4), pages 325-332, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.
    2. Francesca Collevecchio & Valerio Temperini & Virginia Barba-Sanchez & Angel Meseguer-Martinez, 2025. "Sustainable Governance: Board Sustainability Experience and the Interplay with Board Age for Firm Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 371-389, March.
    3. Zhongtian Li & Jing Jia & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2022. "The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1292-1324, July.
    4. Thi H.H. Nguyen & Mohamed H. Elmagrhi & Collins G. Ntim & Yue Wu, 2021. "Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2313-2331, July.
    5. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    6. Nurlan Orazalin, 2020. "Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 140-153, January.
    7. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Camélia Radu & Nadia Smaili, 2021. "Corporate performance patterns of Canadian listed firms: Balancing financial and corporate social responsibility outcomes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3344-3359, November.
    9. Jonathan Taglialatela & Ivan Miroshnychenko & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa, 2024. "Talk or walk? The board of directors and firm environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2890-2910, May.
    10. Renata Konadu & Gabriel Sam Ahinful & Samuel Owusu-Agyei, 2021. "Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 269-289, September.
    11. Eugenio Zubeltzu‐Jaka & Igor Álvarez‐Etxeberria & Eduardo Ortas, 2020. "The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta‐analytic approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1361-1374, May.
    12. Altunbas, Yener & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Reghezza, Alessio & Velliscig, Giulio, 2022. "Does gender diversity in the workplace mitigate climate change?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Adu, Douglas A. & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Saa, Vida Y. & Boateng, Frank, 2024. "Bank sustainability, climate change initiatives and financial performance: The role of corporate governance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    14. Jibriel Elsayih & Rina Datt & Qingliang Tang & Ali Hamid & Maria Estela Varua, 2023. "Exploring the determinants of carbon management system quality: The role of corporate governance and climate risks and opportunities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4065-4091, December.
    15. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Jeanne, Amar & Demaria, Samira & Rigot, Sandra, 2023. "What are the drivers of corporates' climate transparency? Evidence from the S&P 1200 index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Akshita Arora & Khaoula Aliani, 2024. "Nexus between corporate environmental disclosures and gender diversity: Interaction effects of board independence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1113-1128, February.
    18. Karaman, Abdullah S. & Elbardan, Hany & Uyar, Ali & Govindan, Kannan, 2025. "Board composition and sustainable supply chain management: Environmental committee's role," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Peter Kwarteng & Kingsley Opoku Appiah & Bismark Addai, 2023. "Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan Africa," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Clara Gallego‐Sosa & Yakira Fernández‐Torres & Milagros Gutiérrez‐Fernández, 2024. "The 2030 Agenda and sustainable development in tourism firms: Board gender diversity and environmental policy on natural resource use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 629-649, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:3739-3763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.