IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p2882-2896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Policies, Greener Wallets: How Cap‐and‐Trade Regulation Affects Cost of Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyu Hu
  • Zilin Hu
  • Qingyang Wu

Abstract

As one of the most efficient regulations on climate abatement, the cap‐and‐trade mechanism has been broadly adopted to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Although there are common concerns about the nexus between environmental regulations and financial markets, this paper investigates how cap‐and‐trade policy affects companies' cost of equity (COE) and cost of debt (COD) and explores the underlying mechanisms. By merging nationwide data from China's listed companies and exploiting the staggered introduction of cap‐and‐trade pilots as a quasi‐natural experiment, we apply a propensity score matching and difference‐in‐differences framework. We find robust evidence that cap‐and‐trade policy significantly decreases companies' COE by 0.341% and COD by 0.492%, respectively. The reduction in capital costs makes cap‐and‐trade an attractive policy that can ease financing burdens, promote sustainable investment, and facilitate green transformation toward carbon neutrality. Mechanism analyses suggest that cap‐and‐trade regulation affects cost of capital through environmental information disclosure and current ratio. This study enriches the literature on comprehensive outcomes of cap‐and‐trade regulation in emerging economies and offers implications for regulators, managers, and stakeholders navigating the transition toward a net‐zero future.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyu Hu & Zilin Hu & Qingyang Wu, 2025. "Green Policies, Greener Wallets: How Cap‐and‐Trade Regulation Affects Cost of Capital," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2882-2896, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:2882-2896
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:2882-2896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.