IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i7p7216-7240.html

Carbon accounting and integrated reporting for net‐zero business models towards sustainable development: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Assunta Di Vaio
  • Anum Zaffar
  • Meghna Chhabra
  • Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente

Abstract

This study highlights the main concerns regarding firms' carbon accounting and decarbonization practices. Under institutional, legitimacy and stakeholder theories, this study analyses the linkages between carbon accounting outputs and integrated reporting (IR), as well as between disclosure assurance systems in the transition towards net‐zero business models (n‐ZBMs). This study emphasizes the awareness of accounting tools to be considered environmental and social measures due to decarbonization practices. This study developed a systematic literature review (SLR) of 433 English articles published in Scopus database and Google Scholar between the years 1990 and 2024. It is a consolidated methodological approach in the ‘sustainability accounting’ research field to fill the existing gaps that justify this study. The results of this study highlight that IR and carbon accounting awareness enhance firms' performance and have positive social and environmental impacts with the adoption of decarbonization practices towards n‐ZBMs through an improved understanding of stakeholders and regulatory pressures. This study is the first to explore the relationship between carbon accounting awareness and IR about the decarbonization practices, as well as the role of assurance in the transition for n‐ZBMs. This study tries to move from the concept of legitimacy of the decarbonization practices that firms aim to achieve through sustainable disclosure to the legitimacy of business models towards net‐zero emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Assunta Di Vaio & Anum Zaffar & Meghna Chhabra & Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente, 2024. "Carbon accounting and integrated reporting for net‐zero business models towards sustainable development: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7), pages 7216-7240, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:7216-7240
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:7216-7240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.