IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i7p6795-6813.html

Positive, negative or graded sustainability labelling? Which is most effective at promoting a shift towards more sustainable product choices?

Author

Listed:
  • John Thøgersen
  • François J. Dessart
  • Ginevra Marandola
  • Stefanie Lena Hille

Abstract

Sustainability labels convey information about different product attributes, such as its environmental impact, lifespan or ethical performance. The labelling can be either positive (only identifying the most sustainable products available on the market), negative (only identifying the least sustainable products available on the market) or graded (comparing the sustainable performance of a product with that of all other products on the market). We assess the relative performance of these three labelling approaches in terms of influencing product choices. A nationally representative sample of 1243 consumers from Germany, Spain and the Czech Republic participated in an incentive‐compatible online discrete choice experiment with random allocation to different labelling approaches. Compared with positive and negative labels, graded labels were most effective in guiding consumers towards more sustainable product choices. These findings support policy interventions that convey product sustainability with graded labels.

Suggested Citation

  • John Thøgersen & François J. Dessart & Ginevra Marandola & Stefanie Lena Hille, 2024. "Positive, negative or graded sustainability labelling? Which is most effective at promoting a shift towards more sustainable product choices?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(7), pages 6795-6813, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:6795-6813
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3838
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:7:p:6795-6813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.