IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i4p3497-3509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

False discovery rate‐controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff‐based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Dai
  • Cheng Zheng

Abstract

False discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedures provide important statistical guarantees for replicability in signal identification based on multiple hypotheses testing. In many fields of study, FDR controling procedures are used in high‐dimensional (HD) analyses to discover features that are truly associated with the outcome. In some recent applications, data on the same set of candidate features are independently collected in multiple different studies. For example, gene expression data are collected at different facilities and with different cohorts, to identify the genetic biomarkers of multiple types of cancers. These studies provide us with opportunities to identify signals by considering information from different sources (with potential heterogeneity) jointly. This paper is about how to provide FDR control guarantees for the tests of union null hypotheses of conditional independence. We present a knockoff‐based variable selection method (Simultaneous knockoffs) to identify mutual signals from multiple independent datasets, providing exact FDR control guarantees under finite sample settings. This method can work with very general model settings and test statistics. We demonstrate the performance of this method with extensive numerical studies and two real‐data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Dai & Cheng Zheng, 2023. "False discovery rate‐controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff‐based approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3497-3509, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3497-3509
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13848
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Bogomolov & Ruth Heller, 2018. "Assessing replicability of findings across two studies of multiple features," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 505-516.
    2. Marina Bogomolov & Ruth Heller, 2013. "Discovering Findings That Replicate From a Primary Study of High Dimension to a Follow-Up Study," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(504), pages 1480-1492, December.
    3. Stephen Bates & Emmanuel Candès & Lucas Janson & Wenshuo Wang, 2021. "Metropolized Knockoff Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(535), pages 1413-1427, July.
    4. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    5. Dongdong Xiang & Sihai Dave Zhao & T. Tony Cai, 2019. "Signal classification for the integrative analysis of multiple sequences of large‐scale multiple tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(4), pages 707-734, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng An & Haixiang Zhang, 2023. "High-Dimensional Mediation Analysis for Time-to-Event Outcomes with Additive Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Tomohiro Ando & Ruey S. Tsay, 2009. "Model selection for generalized linear models with factor‐augmented predictors," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 207-235, May.
    3. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    4. Jing Zhang & Qihua Wang & Xuan Wang, 2022. "Surrogate-variable-based model-free feature screening for survival data under the general censoring mechanism," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 379-397, April.
    5. Sauvenier, Mathieu & Van Bellegem, Sébastien, 2023. "Direction Identification and Minimax Estimation by Generalized Eigenvalue Problem in High Dimensional Sparse Regression," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2023005, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Ahmed Ismaïl & Hartikainen Anna-Liisa & Järvelin Marjo-Riitta & Richardson Sylvia, 2011. "False Discovery Rate Estimation for Stability Selection: Application to Genome-Wide Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Emre Demirkaya & Yang Feng & Pallavi Basu & Jinchi Lv, 2022. "Large-scale model selection in misspecified generalized linear models [Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(1), pages 123-136.
    8. Shan Luo & Zehua Chen, 2014. "Sequential Lasso Cum EBIC for Feature Selection With Ultra-High Dimensional Feature Space," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 1229-1240, September.
    9. Shi Chen & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Brenda L'opez Cabrera, 2020. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Power Derivative Market," Papers 2009.09739, arXiv.org.
    10. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    11. Laurent Ferrara & Anna Simoni, 2023. "When are Google Data Useful to Nowcast GDP? An Approach via Preselection and Shrinkage," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 1188-1202, October.
    12. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    13. Linh H. Nghiem & Francis K.C. Hui & Samuel Müller & A.H. Welsh, 2023. "Screening methods for linear errors‐in‐variables models in high dimensions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 926-939, June.
    14. Caroline Jardet & Baptiste Meunier, 2022. "Nowcasting world GDP growth with high‐frequency data," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1181-1200, September.
    15. Peter Bühlmann & Jacopo Mandozzi, 2014. "High-dimensional variable screening and bias in subsequent inference, with an empirical comparison," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 407-430, June.
    16. Sangjin Kim & Jong-Min Kim, 2019. "Two-Stage Classification with SIS Using a New Filter Ranking Method in High Throughput Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Anders Bredahl Kock, 2012. "On the Oracle Property of the Adaptive Lasso in Stationary and Nonstationary Autoregressions," CREATES Research Papers 2012-05, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    18. Tang, Yanlin & Song, Xinyuan & Wang, Huixia Judy & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2013. "Variable selection in high-dimensional quantile varying coefficient models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 115-132.
    19. Hung Hung & Su‐Yun Huang, 2019. "Sufficient dimension reduction via random‐partitions for the large‐p‐small‐n problem," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 245-255, March.
    20. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3497-3509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.