IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v77y2021i3p1075-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A batch‐effect adjusted Simon's two‐stage design for cancer vaccine clinical studies

Author

Listed:
  • Chenguang Wang
  • Zhixin Wang
  • Gary L. Rosner
  • Warner K. Huh
  • Richard B.S. Roden
  • Sejong Bae

Abstract

In the development of cancer treatment vaccines, phase II clinical studies are conducted to examine the efficacy of a vaccine in order to screen out vaccines with minimal activity. Immune responses are commonly used as the primary endpoint for assessing vaccine efficacy. With respect to study design, Simon's two‐stage design is a popular format for phase II cancer clinical studies because of its simplicity and ethical considerations. Nonetheless, it is not straightforward to apply Simon's two‐stage design to cancer vaccine studies when performing immune assays in batches, as outcomes from multiple patients may be correlated with each other in the presence of batch effects. This violates the independence assumption of Simon's two‐stage design. In this paper, we numerically explore the impact of batch effects on Simon's two‐stage design, propose a batch‐effect adjusted Simon's two‐stage design, demonstrate the proposed design by both a simulation study and a therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine trial, and briefly introduce a software that implements the proposed design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenguang Wang & Zhixin Wang & Gary L. Rosner & Warner K. Huh & Richard B.S. Roden & Sejong Bae, 2021. "A batch‐effect adjusted Simon's two‐stage design for cancer vaccine clinical studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1075-1088, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:1075-1088
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:77:y:2021:i:3:p:1075-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.