IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v76y2020i3p963-972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrections for measurement error due to delayed onset of illness for case‐crossover designs

Author

Listed:
  • Brent A. Coull
  • Seokho Lee
  • Glen McGee
  • Justin Manjourides
  • Murray A. Mittleman
  • Gregory A. Wellenius

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies of the short‐term effects of ambient particulate matter (PM) on the risk of acute cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events often use data from administrative databases in which only the date of hospitalization is known. A common study design for analyzing such data is the case‐crossover design, in which exposure at a time when a patient experiences an event is compared to exposure at times when the patient did not experience an event within a case‐control paradigm. However, the time of true event onset may precede hospitalization by hours or days, which can yield attenuated effect estimates. In this article, we consider a marginal likelihood estimator, a regression calibration estimator, and a conditional score estimator, as well as parametric bootstrap versions of each, to correct for this bias. All considered approaches require validation data on the distribution of the delay times. We compare the performance of the approaches in realistic scenarios via simulation, and apply the methods to analyze data from a Boston‐area study of the association between ambient air pollution and acute stroke onset. Based on both simulation and the case study, we conclude that a two‐stage regression calibration estimator with a parametric bootstrap bias correction is an effective method for correcting bias in health effect estimates arising from delayed onset in a case‐crossover study.

Suggested Citation

  • Brent A. Coull & Seokho Lee & Glen McGee & Justin Manjourides & Murray A. Mittleman & Gregory A. Wellenius, 2020. "Corrections for measurement error due to delayed onset of illness for case‐crossover designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 963-972, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:963-972
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13173
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magne Thoresen & Petter Laake, 2000. "A Simulation Study of Measurement Error Correction Methods in Logistic Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 868-872, September.
    2. Lisa M. McShane & Douglas N. Midthune & Joanne F. Dorgan & Laurence S. Freedman & Raymond J. Carroll, 2001. "Covariate Measurement Error Adjustment for Matched Case–Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 62-73, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinha, Samiran & Yoo, Seungyoon, 2013. "Score tests in the presence of errors in covariates in matched case-control studies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 157-171.
    2. Akib Khan & Atonu Rabbani, 2015. "Assessing The Spatial Accessibility Of Microfinance In Northern Bangladesh: A Gis Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 842-870, November.
    3. Zhiwei Zhang & Paul S. Albert, 2011. "Binary Regression Analysis with Pooled Exposure Measurements: A Regression Calibration Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 636-645, June.
    4. Nels G. Johnson & Inyoung Kim, 2019. "Semiparametric approaches for matched case–control studies with error-in-covariates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1675-1692, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:963-972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.