IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v76y2020i1p224-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and analysis of bridging studies with prior probabilities on the null and alternative hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Donglin Zeng
  • Zhiying Pan
  • D. Y. Lin

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies are increasingly interested in conducting bridging studies in order to bring an approved drug product from the original region (eg, United States or European Union) to a new region (eg, Asian‐Pacific countries). In this article, we provide a new methodology for the design and analysis of bridging studies by assuming prior knowledge on how the null and alternative hypotheses in the original, foreign study are related to the null and alternative hypotheses in the bridging study and setting the type I error for the bridging study according to the strength of the foreign‐study evidence. The new methodology accounts for randomness in the foreign‐study evidence and controls the average type I error of the bridging study over all possibilities of the foreign‐study evidence. In addition, the new methodology increases statistical power, when compared to approaches that do not use foreign‐study evidence, and it allows for the possibility of not conducting the bridging study when the foreign‐study evidence is unfavorable. Finally, we conducted extensive simulation studies to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Donglin Zeng & Zhiying Pan & D. Y. Lin, 2020. "Design and analysis of bridging studies with prior probabilities on the null and alternative hypotheses," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 224-234, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:1:p:224-234
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13175
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:1:p:224-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.