IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i4p1401-1413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved detection of epigenomic marks with mixed‐effects hidden Markov models

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro L. Baldoni
  • Naim U. Rashid
  • Joseph G. Ibrahim

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next‐generation sequencing (ChIP‐seq) is a technique to detect genomic regions containing protein‐DNA interaction, such as transcription factor binding sites or regions containing histone modifications. One goal of the analysis of ChIP‐seq experiments is to identify genomic loci enriched for sequencing reads pertaining to DNA bound to the factor of interest. The accurate identification of such regions aids in the understanding of epigenomic marks and gene regulatory mechanisms. Given the reduction of massively parallel sequencing costs, methods to detect consensus regions of enrichment across multiple samples are of interest. Here, we present a statistical model to detect broad consensus regions of enrichment from ChIP‐seq technical or biological replicates through a class of zero‐inflated mixed‐effects hidden Markov models. We show that the proposed model outperforms existing methods for consensus peak calling in common epigenomic marks by accounting for the excess zeros and sample‐specific biases. We apply our method to data from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements and Roadmap Epigenomics projects and also from an extensive simulation study.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro L. Baldoni & Naim U. Rashid & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2019. "Improved detection of epigenomic marks with mixed‐effects hidden Markov models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1401-1413, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1401-1413
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1401-1413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.